Do luxury room amenities affect guests' willingness to pay?

被引:79
|
作者
Heo, Cindy Yoonjoung [1 ]
Hyun, Sunghyup Sean [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Hoteliere Lausanne HES SO, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Hanyang Univ, Sch Tourism, Seoul 133791, South Korea
关键词
Room amenity; Positivity bias; Willingness to pay; Luxury brand; Hotel room pricing; POSITIVITY; DETERMINANTS; FAMILIARITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Intangible services have fewer cues to enable consumer evaluation compared to physical goods. Cues are therefore particularly important for highly intangible services, since they provide tangible evidence of quality. This study explores whether luxury brand room amenities can be used as cues for customers to evaluate a hotel. This study attempts to identify what items and amenities guests find most/least useful and to examine whether luxury brand room amenities can enhance customers' evaluation of a hotel and increase willingness to pay based on positivity bias. Wi-Fi was regarded as the most useful hotel amenity, while telephone was regarded as the least useful amenity. This study found customers willingness to pay is affected by providing luxury brand room amenities. When luxury amenities were placed in the room, customers' estimation of the room rate and their willingness to pay for it both increased. Moreover, about two out of five expressed a willingness to pay extra for an upgrade to access luxury brand room amenities. The findings of this study provide important implications for hotel practitioners. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does information about organic status affect consumer sensory liking and willingness to pay for beer?
    Waldrop, Megan E.
    McCluskey, Jill J.
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2019, 35 (02) : 149 - 167
  • [42] Willingness to pay towards a public good: how does a refund option affect stated values?
    O'Neill, Stephen
    Yadav, Lava Prakash
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (02) : 342 - 359
  • [43] Social economic factors that affect cattle farmer's willingness to pay for artificial insemination programs
    Sirajuddin, Sitti Nurani
    Sudirman, Indriati
    Bahar, Lydia Devega
    Al Tawaha, Abdel Rahman
    Al-Tawaha, Abdel Razzaq
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 24 (04): : 574 - 580
  • [44] Estimating willingness to pay: do health and environmental researchers have different methodological standards?
    Oezdemir, Semra
    Johnson, F. Reed
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (16) : 2215 - 2229
  • [45] Do Atlanta residents value MARTA? Selecting an autoregressive model to recover willingness to pay
    Macfarlane, Gregory S.
    Garrow, Laurie A.
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 78 : 214 - 230
  • [46] Do Unions Affect Pay Methods of Canadian Firms? A Longitudinal Study
    Long, Richard J.
    Shields, John L.
    RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2009, 64 (03): : 442 - 465
  • [47] The effect of hotel’s dual-branding on willingness-to-pay and booking intention: a luxury/upper-upscale combination
    Kim M.
    Tang C.-H.
    Roehl W.S.
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2018, 17 (4) : 256 - 275
  • [48] How environmental policies affect personal willingness to pay for environmental protection: an investigation of interpretative and resource effects
    Shangrui Wang
    Guohua Wang
    Yiming Xiao
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26 : 1591 - 1613
  • [49] How environmental policies affect personal willingness to pay for environmental protection: an investigation of interpretative and resource effects
    Wang, Shangrui
    Wang, Guohua
    Xiao, Yiming
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (01) : 1591 - 1613
  • [50] Does government involvement and awareness of benefit affect Ghanaian?s willingness to pay for renewable green electricity?
    Nketiah, Emmanuel
    Song, Huaming
    Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson
    Obuobi, Bright
    Adjei, Mavis
    Cudjoe, Dan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 197 : 683 - 694