An integrated quality-function-deployment and stochastic-dominance-based decision-making approach for prioritizing product concept alternatives

被引:6
作者
Wang, Zeng-Qiang [1 ]
Chen, Zhen-Song [2 ]
Garg, Harish [3 ]
Pu, Yun [4 ]
Chin, Kwai-Sang [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Engn Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol, Sch Math, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India
[4] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Adv Design & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] City Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quality function deployment; Product planning house of quality; Product concept alternative; Stochastic dominance; Unbalanced linguistic term; ELECTRE-III; FUZZY-QFD; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; DESIGN; SELECTION; SUPPORT; REQUIREMENTS; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s40747-022-00681-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
For continuous growth and sustaining the competitiveness of a company, product developers spend most of their time making crucial decisions to address a great variety of unpredictable and uncontrollable information. Several mathematical approaches have already been adopted to aid the developers in selecting the best product concept for meeting customers' requirements and exceeding their expectations. However, those methods do not cope with fully revealed developers' preferences and do not take into account the random distribution of the target values of engineering characteristics (ECs). In this paper, the application of a quality function deployment (QFD)-based model and a stochastic dominance-based method is presented for product concept development. The first phase in the approach is to construct a product planning house of quality (PPHoQ), which is the core and the engine of the entire QFD model. This model depicts the relationship between the customers' requirements (CRs) and the ECs for a product. The proposed approach addresses both the relationships between CRs and ECs, in addition to the correlations among the ECs. In this study, developers are invited to express their preferences using different types of linguistic terms dependent on their diverse backgrounds and understanding levels of the product. Based on the outcomes of the PPHoQ process, a variety of alternative concepts can be created. The alternatives are then prioritized and ranked in the second phase. The proposed approach facilitates the random distribution with stochastic variables rather than fuzzy methods to obtain more realistic product concept alternatives. Several examples and comparative results further illustrate that unbalanced linguistic terms and stochastic dominance efficiently endow the product concept selection model with uncertain information and the random distribution in a realistic style.
引用
收藏
页码:2541 / 2556
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A group decision-making method with fuzzy set theory and genetic algorithms in quality function deployment [J].
Liu, Chin-Hung .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2010, 44 (06) :1175-1189
[32]   Fuzzy soft set-based approach to prioritizing technical attributes in quality function deployment [J].
Zhihui Yang ;
Yizhen Chen .
Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 23 :2493-2500
[33]   Stochastic multicriteria decision-making approach based on SMAA-ELECTRE with extended gray numbers [J].
Zhou, Huan ;
Wang, Jian-qiang ;
Zhang, Hong-yu .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (05) :2032-2052
[34]   A systematic decision-making method for evaluating design alternatives of product service system based on variable precision rough set [J].
Zhang, Zaifang ;
Xu, Danhua ;
Ostrosi, Egon ;
Yu, Li ;
Fan, Beibei .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2019, 30 (04) :1895-1909
[35]   Picture fuzzy set and quality function deployment approach based novel framework for multi-criteria group decision making method [J].
Singh, Akanksha ;
Kumar, Sanjay .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 104
[36]   Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment [J].
Dincer, Hasan ;
Yuksel, Serhat ;
Martinez, Luis .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 115 :152-171
[37]   ORDINAL DATA IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, A STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE APPROACH TO SITING NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANTS [J].
RIETVELD, P ;
OUWERSLOOT, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 56 (02) :249-262
[38]   A new integrated decision-making approach for design alternative selection for supporting complex product development [J].
Zhang, Zaifang ;
Chu, Xuening .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2009, 22 (03) :179-198
[39]   Benefits Realization: Novel Conceptual Model for Front End-Design Decision-Making Using Dempster-Shafer Theory and Quality Function Deployment [J].
Serugga, Joas ;
Kagioglou, Mike ;
Tzortzopoulos, Patricia .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (07)
[40]   Decision-Making Framework for Prioritizing the Improvement of Pedestrian Facilities in Urban Areas Using Integrated Delphi, AHP, and TOPSIS Approach [J].
Aromal, V ;
Naseer, M. A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, :889-906