Detection of West Nile virus in large pools of mosquitoes

被引:28
作者
Sutherland, Genevieve L. [1 ]
Nasci, Roger S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Vector Borne Infect Dis, Arboviral Dis Branch, Ft Collins, CO 80522 USA
关键词
West Nile virus; arbovirus surveillance; pool size; VecTest (R); RAMP (R);
D O I
10.2987/5630.1
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a laboratory evaluation of the ability of commercial antigen-capture assays, the Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform (RAMP (R)) and the VecTest (R) wicking assay, as well as Real Time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, Taqman) and Vero cell plaque assay to detect West Nile virus (WN-V) in large mosquito pools. Real-Time PCR (Taqman) was the most sensitive, detecting WN-V ribonucleic acid (RNA) in 100% of samples containing a single infected mosquito in pool sizes of up to 500 mosquitoes. Mosquito body tissues minimally impacted the ability of Real Time RT-PCR to detect WNV in a pool size of 500, reducing sensitivity by 0.6 log(10) plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml. Vero cell plaque assay detected live virus from a single infected mosquito in 100% of pools containing up to 200 mosquitoes, but was unreliable at larger pool sizes. VecTest detected 100% of positive pools containing 50 mosquitoes with 5.8 log(10) PFU/ml virus, 100 mosquitoes with 5.9 log(10) PFU/ml, and 200 mosquitoes with 5.2 log(10) PFU/ml, The RAMP assay detected 100% of positive pools containing 50 mosquitoes with 3.3 log(10) PFU/ml virus, 100 mosquitoes with 3.7 log(10) PFU/ml, and 200 mosquitoes with 4.0 log(10) PFU/ml. Results indicate that WN-V can be reliably detected by all 4 assays in pools of mosquitoes exceeding 50 specimens, though there is some loss of sensitivity with very large pool sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 395
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Anderson JF, 2006, J MED ENTOMOL, V43, P1010, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[1010:WNVFFA]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Epidemiology of West Nile virus in Connecticut: A five-year analysis of mosquito data 1999-2003 [J].
Andreadis, TG ;
Anderson, JF ;
Vossbrinck, CR ;
Main, AJ .
VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2004, 4 (04) :360-378
[4]  
Burkhalter KL, 2006, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V22, P64, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[64:EOCAFD]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Blinded laboratory comparison of the in situ enzyme immunoassay, the VecTest wicking assay, and a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay to detect mosquitoes infected with west nile and St. Louis encephalitis viruses [J].
Chiles, RE ;
Green, EN ;
Fang, Y ;
Goddard, L ;
Roth, A ;
Reisen, WK ;
Scott, TW .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2004, 41 (04) :539-544
[7]  
FOSTER WA, 2002, MED ENTOMOL, P204
[8]   Short report: Detection probability of arbovirus infection in mosquito populations [J].
Gu, WD ;
Novak, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2004, 71 (05) :636-638
[9]   ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY AND VIRUS ISOLATION PROCEDURES FOR SURVEILLANCE OF ARBOVIRUSES IN MOSQUITO POPULATIONS [J].
HILDRETH, SW ;
BEATY, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1987, 25 (06) :976-981
[10]   Detection of West Nile virus antigen in mosquitoes and avian tissues by a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassay [J].
Hunt, AR ;
Hall, RA ;
Kerst, AJ ;
Nasci, RS ;
Savage, HM ;
Panella, NA ;
Gottfried, KL ;
Burkhalter, KL ;
Roehrig, JT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (06) :2023-2030