Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome

被引:64
作者
Machtei, Eli E. [1 ,2 ]
Mahler, Dan [1 ]
Oettinger-Barak, Orit [1 ,2 ]
Zuabi, Otman [1 ]
Horwitz, Jacob [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Oral & Dent Med, Unit Periodontol, IL-31096 Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
关键词
dental implants; failures; modifying factors; redo; replacement; success rate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01466.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival rate of dental implants in previously failed implant sites. In addition, factors that might affect the outcome of these redo procedures were also explored. Material and methods: Patients that had failed dental implants, which were replaced with the same implant type at the same site, were included. Data on the failed implants were collected. The same parameters, along with the interval between retrieval and re-implantation, were collected for the second set of implants. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patients and implants. Life table analysis of these implants was tabulated for both implant sets. The effect of systemic, environmental and local factors on the survival of the redo dental implants was evaluated. Results: Fifty-six patients with a total of 79 redo implants were included in this study. Implants were followed for 7-78 months (mean 29.9 +/- 2). Thirteen implants failed that resulted in an overall survival rate of 83.5%. Successful implants had greater diameter (4.05 +/- 0.52 mm) than failed implants (3.72 +/- 0.56 mm); however, these differences were only marginal (P=0.06). Conversely, smoking habits, implants length and location, mode of placement and spontaneous exposure did not have a significant effect on the outcome of this procedure. Conclusion: Redo of dental implants has a lesser survival rate compared with previous reports for implants in pristine sites. These results were not associated with most implant- and/or patient-related factors. Thus, a possible negative effect that is associated with the specific implant's site might account for this phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Alsaadi G, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P270
[2]  
Ashley Eric T, 2003, J Contemp Dent Pract, V4, P35
[3]  
Brocard D, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P691
[4]   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
MericskeStern, R ;
Bernard, JP ;
Behneke, A ;
Behneke, N ;
Hirt, HP ;
Belser, UC ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :161-172
[5]   Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention [J].
Çaliskan, MK .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 100 (02) :242-248
[6]   Frailty approach for the analysis of clustered failure time observations in dental research [J].
Chuang, SK ;
Cai, T ;
Douglass, CW ;
Wei, LJ ;
Dodson, TB .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 84 (01) :54-58
[7]   Reoperation is not an independent predictor of mortality during aortic valve surgery [J].
Davierwala, PM ;
Borger, MA ;
David, TE ;
Rao, V ;
Maganti, M ;
Yau, TM .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 131 (02) :329-335
[8]   The effect of antimicrobial therapy on periimplantitis lesions - An experimental study in the dog [J].
Ericsson, I ;
Persson, LG ;
Berglundh, T ;
Edlund, T ;
Lindhe, J .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (04) :320-328
[9]  
Esposito M, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V48, P559, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:4<559::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-M