Randomized comparison of the continuous vs point-by-point radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for atrial flutter

被引:30
作者
Miyazaki, Shinsuke
Takahashi, Atsushi
Kuwahara, Taishi
Kobori, Atsushi
Yokoyama, Yasuhiro
Nozato, Toshihiro
Sato, Akira
Aonuma, Kazutaka
Hirao, Kenzo
Isobe, Mitsuaki
机构
[1] Yokosuka Kyosai Hosp, Ctr Cardiovasc, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2388558, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch, Dept Cardiol, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
atrial flutter; catheter ablation; cavotricuspid isthmus;
D O I
10.1253/circj.71.1922
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Achievement of complete conduction block in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a curative ablation technique in patients with common atrial flutter (AFL). The present study was a prospective comparison of the efficacy of 2 ablation strategies in patients with common AFL: the continuous and point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) delivery techniques. Methods and Results Forty patients with common AFL were randomly assigned to either a group treated with a continuous RF delivery or to a group undergoing point-by-point RF ablation. In the first group, the RF energy was continuously delivered during a slow drag of the catheter tip from the tricuspid annulus to the inferior vena cava without stopping the application. In the second group, the RF ablation was performed using a point-by-point approach for 60 s at each point. All patients underwent ablation with an 8-mm-tip ablation catheter with a power limit of 50 W and a target temperature of 55 degrees C. Complete CTI conduction block was achieved in all patients. The patient characteristics, including the anatomy of the CTI estimated by 3-dimensional computed tomography, were no different between the 2 groups. The procedure time (time from the start of RF delivery to the completion of CTI block), fluoroscopic time and total RF energy required to create the CTI block between the continuous and point-by-point groups were 7.3 +/- 5.6 vs 21.2 +/- 22.2min (p < 0.01), 7.2 +/- 4.4 vs 16.2 +/- 14.1 min (p < 0.05), and 15,631 +/- 6,001 vs 24,072 +/- 16,140 joules (p < 0.05), respectively. There were no complications or recurrences of AFL during the follow-up period in any of the patients. Conclusion In the curative treatment of common AFL, the continuous RF delivery approach could shorten the procedure and fluoroscopic time and reduce the total RF energy compared with the point-by-point RF ablation approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1922 / 1926
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Angiographic anatomy of the inferior right atrial isthmus in patients with and without history of common atrial flutter [J].
Cabrera, JA ;
Sanchez-Quintana, D ;
Ho, SY ;
Medina, A ;
Wanguemert, F ;
Gross, E ;
Grillo, J ;
Hernandez, E ;
Anderson, RH .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (23) :3017-3023
[2]   RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF THE INFERIOR VENA-CAVA - TRICUSPID-VALVE ISTHMUS IN COMMON ATRIAL-FLUTTER [J].
COSIO, FG ;
LOPEZGIL, M ;
GOICOLEA, A ;
ARRIBAS, F ;
BARROSO, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (08) :705-709
[3]   Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus [J].
Da Costa, A ;
Faure, E ;
Thévenin, J ;
Messier, M ;
Bernard, S ;
Abdel, K ;
Robin, C ;
Romeyer, C ;
Isaaz, K .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (09) :1030-1035
[4]   RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN TYPE-1 ATRIAL-FLUTTER - IDENTIFICATION OF A CRITICAL ZONE IN THE REENTRANT CIRCUIT BY ENDOCARDIAL MAPPING TECHNIQUES [J].
FELD, GK ;
FLECK, RP ;
CHEN, PS ;
BOYCE, K ;
BAHNSON, TD ;
STEIN, JB ;
CALISI, CM ;
IBARRA, M .
CIRCULATION, 1992, 86 (04) :1233-1240
[5]  
HEIBUCHEL H, 2000, CIRCULATION, V101, P2178
[6]   Left atrial appendage outflow velocity is superior to conventional criteria for predicting of maintenance of sinus rhythm after simple cryoublation of pulmonary vein orifices [J].
Isobe, N ;
Taniguchi, K ;
Oshima, S ;
Kamiyama, H ;
Ezure, M ;
Kaneko, T ;
Tada, H ;
Adachi, H ;
Toyama, T ;
Naito, S ;
Hoshizaki, H .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (04) :446-451
[7]   Influence of right atrial structure on outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for common atrial flutter [J].
Ohba, Y ;
Shimoike, E ;
Ueda, N ;
Maruyama, T ;
Kaji, Y ;
Fujino, T ;
Niho, Y .
JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 2000, 64 (10) :741-744
[8]   Electrophysiologic and anatomical characteristics of the right atrial posterior wall in patients with and without atrial flutter - Analysis by intracardiac echocardiography [J].
Okumura, Yasuo ;
Watanabe, Ichiro ;
Ashino, Sonoko ;
Kofune, Masayoshi ;
Ohkubo, Kimie ;
Takagi, Yasuhiro ;
Kawauchi, Kazunori ;
Yamada, Takeshi ;
Hashimoto, Kenichi ;
Shindo, Atsushi ;
Sugimura, Hidezou ;
Nakai, Toshiko ;
Saito, Satoshi .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (05) :636-642
[9]   Acute coronary occlusion during radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter [J].
Ouali, S ;
Anselme, F ;
Savouré, A ;
Cribier, A .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (10) :1047-1049
[10]   Radio frequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter - Further insights into the various types of isthmus block: Application to ablation during sinus rhythm [J].
Poty, H ;
Saoudi, N ;
Nair, M ;
Anselme, F ;
Letac, B .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (12) :3204-3213