Foreign direct investment, unionised labour markets and welfare
被引:2
|
作者:
Cao, Jiyun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
Collaborat Innovat Ctr China Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R ChinaNankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
Cao, Jiyun
[1
,2
]
Mukherjee, Arijit
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Jubilee Campus,Wollaton Rd, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
CESifo, Munich, Germany
INFER, Cologne, Germany
City Univ Hong Kong, GRU, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R ChinaNankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
Mukherjee, Arijit
[3
,4
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Collaborat Innovat Ctr China Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
Foreign direct investment;
Labour union;
Welfare;
LOCATION;
TRADE;
DECISION;
MERGERS;
EXPORT;
WAGES;
FDI;
D O I:
10.1016/j.iref.2018.04.004
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
Although empirical evidence on the relationship between labour union and foreign direct investment (FDI) is mixed, the theoretical literature mainly explains the negative relationship between labour union and FDI. We show that a multinational firm may prefer FDI in the presence of labour unions if it is sufficiently technologically superior to its domestic counterpart. FDI (compared to export) makes the domestic labour union better off but it makes the consumers, the domestic firm, the foreign labour union and the foreign country worse off, and may reduce domestic welfare. We show the implications of industry-wide and firm-specific labour unions.
机构:
Romanian Acad, Inst Econ Forecasting, Casa Academiei, Casa Acad,Calea 13,Septembrie 13, Bucharest, RomaniaRomanian Acad, Inst Econ Forecasting, Casa Academiei, Casa Acad,Calea 13,Septembrie 13, Bucharest, Romania
Simionescu, Mihaela
Naros, Maria-Simona
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Romanian Acad, Sch Adv Studies, Calea Victoriei 125, Bucharest, RomaniaRomanian Acad, Inst Econ Forecasting, Casa Academiei, Casa Acad,Calea 13,Septembrie 13, Bucharest, Romania
Naros, Maria-Simona
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE,
2019,
11
(01):
: 5
-
14