Confirmatory factor analysis of the Korean version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire with chronic pain patients: a comparison of alternative models

被引:12
作者
Choi, Sun Ah [1 ]
Son, ChongNak [2 ]
Lee, Jang-Han [1 ]
Cho, Sungkun [3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Psychol, Seoul 156756, South Korea
[2] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, Jeonju Si 561756, Jeollabuk Do, South Korea
[3] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, Taejon 305764, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Short-form McGill pain questionnaire; Chronic pain; Korean; Confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-014-0195-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Short Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is the most widely used assessment of the quality and intensity of pain. In previous validation studies, the factor structure of the SF-MPQ varied widely from various two-factor structures to a five-factor structure, although research on the SF-MPQ quite consistently supports its two-factor structure (i.e., sensory and affective) across different countries and languages. In Korea, the results of exploratory factor analysis of a Korea version of SF-MPQ (KSF-MPQ) showed 2-factor structure consisting of 'sensory' and 'affective' excluding two items such as splitting and heavy. As an attempt to further validate the KSF-MPQ, the purpose of this study was to confirm whether the KSF-MPQ model is an appropriate model for chronic pain patients in Korea by comparing several alternative models of the SF-MPQ. Findings: A total of 150 chronic pain patients seeking treatment in Seoul, Korea, participated and completed the KSF-MPQ. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the adequacy of the KSF-MPQ model and several alternative models. The results indicated that the adjusted KSF-MPQ model showed the best fit to the data among the models in chronic pain patients in Korea. Conclusions: The results showed the KSF-MPQ is cross-culturally equivalent to the original questionnaire. Thus, the KSF-MPQ is valid measurement for assessing the quality and intensity of pain to chronic pain patients and may be helpful in clinical and research settings in Korea.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity [J].
Monticone, Marco ;
Ambrosini, Emilia ;
Rocca, Barbara ;
Nava, Tiziana ;
Terragni, Erica ;
Cerri, Cesare ;
McCracken, Lance M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (02) :214-223
[42]   Psychometric Properties of a Korean Version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 in Chronic Pain Patients [J].
Cho, Sungkun ;
Lee, Sun-Mi ;
McCracken, Lance M. ;
Moon, Dong-Eon ;
Heiby, Elaine M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (02) :108-117
[43]   Psychometric Properties of a Korean Version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 in Chronic Pain Patients [J].
Sungkun Cho ;
Sun-Mi Lee ;
Lance M. McCracken ;
Dong-Eon Moon ;
Elaine M. Heiby .
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2010, 17 :108-117
[44]   Results from the translation and adaptation of the Iranian Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (I-SF-MPQ): Preliminary evidence of its reliability, construct validity and sensitivity in an Iranian pain population [J].
Adelmanesh F. ;
Arvantaj A. ;
Rashki H. ;
Ketabchi S. ;
Montazeri A. ;
Raissi G. .
Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, 3 (1)
[45]   Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised for Veterans With Pain [J].
Freed, Rachel D. ;
Emmert-Aronson, Benjamin O. ;
Alschuler, Kevin N. ;
Otis, John D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2019, 16 (04) :535-542
[46]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - brief: An alternative models approach [J].
Boyda, David ;
Shevlin, Mark ;
Mallett, John ;
Murphy, Jamie ;
Houston, James .
PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2013, 5 (02) :187-196
[47]   Validation of the Japanese Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain [J].
Adachi, Tomonori ;
Nakae, Aya ;
Maruo, Tomoyuki ;
Shi, Kenrin ;
Shibata, Masahiko ;
Maeda, Lynn ;
Saitoh, Youichi ;
Sasaki, Jun .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (08) :1405-1417
[48]   The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients [J].
Barke, Antonia ;
Riecke, Jenny ;
Rief, Winfried ;
Glombiewski, Julia A. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
[49]   Factorial Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (ChPVAQ) in a Sample of Chinese Patients with Chronic Pain [J].
Wong, Wing S. ;
McCracken, Lance M. ;
Fielding, Richard .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (07) :1018-1025
[50]   Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Veale, Jaimie F. .
LATERALITY, 2014, 19 (02) :164-177