Intraocular Pressure Measurement with Pneumatonometry and a Tonometer Tip Cover During Negative Pressure Application

被引:3
|
作者
Brambilla, Enrico [1 ]
Ferguson, Tanner J. [2 ]
Chu, Nathan [1 ]
Ammar, David [3 ]
Yoo, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Equinox Ophthalm Inc, Newport Beach, CA USA
[2] Vance Thompson Vis, 3101 W 57th St, Sioux Falls, SD 57108 USA
[3] Lions Eye Inst Transplant & Res, Tampa, FL USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
tonometry; intraocular pressure; TOP; multi-pressure dial; MPD; ophthalmic techniques; diagnostics; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S359605
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: This is a 2-part study to investigate the agreement between pneumatonometry and direct pressure transducer intraocular pressure ( IOP) measurements in a perfusion organ culture (POC) model where (1) the perfusion fluid column is open to atmospheric pressure, holding IOP constant to permit evaluation of the impact of negative pressure (NP) on IOP measurements, and (2) the perfusion fluid column is a closed system, allowing IOP to vary with NP application. Methods: The first part incorporated a fluid column open to atmospheric pressure, maintaining IOP constant to permit evaluation of the effect of applied NP on IOP measurement accuracy. In the second part, the POC column was closed, allowing IOP to vary with NP application and permit evaluation of agreement between pneumatonometry and pressure transducer measurements. In each part, four perfused tissues were used in thirteen paired pre-set IOP (10, 20, 25, 30 mmHg) and NP (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mmHg) combinations, resulting in a total of 1040 paired measurements (520 per study). The difference in IOP measurements (Delta IOP = Excursion tonometry - pressure transducer) was calculated at each paired configuration. Results: During the first part, the mean Delta IOP was -0.7 +/- 1.6 mmHg across all measurements. During the second part, the mean Delta IOP across all measurements was +0.7 +/- 1.4 mmHg. At NP settings of -5, -10, -15, and -20 mmHg, across all pre-set IOPs, the mean TOP reduction via Excursion tonometry was 3.1 +/- 0.3, 5.6 +/- 1.3, 8.5 +/- 1.7 and 11.2 +/- 1.8 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: Measurement of IOP via Excursion tonometry yields results within the accuracy range of the pneumatonometry device (per manufacturer) and is minimally impacted by NP application. The IOP-lowering results are consistent with previous studies and further support the effectiveness of the Multi-Pressure Dial in lowering IOP relative to atmospheric pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1300
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure with a Noncontact Tonometer in Healthy Volunteers
    Maeda, Fumiatsu
    Yaoeda, Kiyoshi
    Tatara, Shunya
    Tsukahara, Yoshinosuke
    Miki, Atsushi
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 3635 - 3640
  • [42] Level of disagreement between Proview™ phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer Intraocular pressure readings
    Rai, S
    Moster, MR
    Kesen, M
    Fontanarosa, J
    Spaeth, GL
    Steinmann, WC
    Wilson, R
    Myers, J
    Henderer, J
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2005, 14 (02) : 120 - 123
  • [43] Measurement of intraocular pressure in clinically normal Turkish Shepherd Dogs with the rebound tonometer (TonoVet®) and the applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen Vet®)
    Kulualp, Kadri
    Yurdakul, Ibrahim
    Erol, Hanifi
    Atalan, Gultekin
    Kilic, Servet
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 74 (09): : 568 - 573
  • [44] The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet (R) rebound tonometer
    de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
    Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
    Williams, David L.
    OPEN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [45] Intraocular pressure measurement using ICare rebound tonometer in different positions of eye and different locations on cornea
    Wongwanwatana, Sirada
    Treesit, Isaraporn
    Funarunart, Panrapee
    Iemsomboon, Wallop
    Choontanom, Raveewan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E34874
  • [46] Validation of intraocular pressure measurement using tonometer AVIA across different postures: A Bland Altman analysis
    Muhsen, Sana
    Rabadi, Alexander
    Alqudah, Mahmoud
    Obiedat, Abdelrahman
    Owies, Liyana
    Alhawaniah, Ibrahim
    Hafez, Sufian Abdel
    Al-Ani, Abdallah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 197 - 205
  • [47] Comparative evaluation of intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Farhood, Qasim K.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 23 - 27
  • [48] THE COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER AND NON-CONTACT AIR PUFF TONOMETER: A CROSS-SECTIONAL RESEARCH
    Arooj, Bushra
    Nadeem, Asmarah
    Ali, Sobia
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (12): : 16875 - 16879
  • [49] Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs
    Park, Young-Woo
    Jeong, Man-Bok
    Kim, Tae-Hyun
    Ahn, Jae-Sang
    Ahn, Jeong-Taek
    Park, Shin-Ae
    Kim, Se-Eun
    Seo, Kangmoon
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 14 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [50] New Non-contact Tonometer HNT-1P Reliability: Comparing Intraocular Pressure, Central Corneal Thickness, and Corrected Intraocular Pressure
    Eah, Kyu Sang
    Shin, Joong Won
    Sung, Kyung Rim
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (05): : 524 - 531