Learner-controlled selection of tasks with different surface and structural features: Effects on transfer and efficiency

被引:19
作者
Corbalan, Gemma [1 ]
Kester, Liesbeth [2 ]
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Curriculum Dev, Dept Res & Advice, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Sch Hlth Profess Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Cognitive load; Learner control; Program control; Structural task features; Surface task features; COGNITIVE LOAD; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.026
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Surface task features are more salient than structural task features and thus easier to recognize for novices. It is predicted that the more salient the task features the better learners can choose personally relevant and varied tasks, which enhances learning transfer. To investigate this prediction, a 2 x 2 factorial experiment with 72 participants studied the effects of control over tasks that differ in their surface features (learner, program) and in their structural features (learner, program). Learner control over the selection of tasks with salient surface features enables learners to select personally relevant and varied tasks. This is believed to yield higher effectiveness (i.e., higher near and far transfer test performance) as well as higher efficiency (i.e.. higher transfer test performance combined with lower associated mental effort). Learner control over the selection of tasks with non-salient structural features does not enable learners to select personally relevant and varied tasks and is therefore not expected to yield beneficial effects on learning. The results show positive effects of learner control over the selection of tasks with salient surface features for efficiency on the far transfer test but not for effectiveness. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Schema induction in problem solving: A multidimensional analysis [J].
Chen, Z ;
Mo, L .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (03) :583-600
[2]   CATEGORIZATION AND REPRESENTATION OF PHYSICS PROBLEMS BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES [J].
CHI, MTH ;
FELTOVICH, PJ ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1981, 5 (02) :121-152
[3]   Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control [J].
Corbalan, Gemma ;
Kester, Liesbeth ;
Van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (05) :399-422
[4]   Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice [J].
Cordova, DI ;
Lepper, MR .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :715-730
[5]  
Gick M.L., 1987, Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications, P9, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-188950-0.50008-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-188950-0.50008-4]
[6]   Practice variability and transfer of training:: The role of self-efficacy generality [J].
Holladay, CL ;
Quiñones, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (06) :1094-1103
[7]   When choice motivates and when it does not [J].
Katz, Idit ;
Assor, Avi .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (04) :429-442
[8]   Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory [J].
Paas, F ;
Tuovinen, JE ;
Tabbers, H ;
Van Gerven, PWM .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 38 (01) :63-71
[9]   THE EFFICIENCY OF INSTRUCTIONAL CONDITIONS - AN APPROACH TO COMBINE MENTAL EFFORT AND PERFORMANCE-MEASURES [J].
PAAS, FGWC ;
VANMERRIENBOER, JJG .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1993, 35 (04) :737-743
[10]   Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems [J].
Quilici, JL ;
Mayer, RE .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :325-342