Methylphenidate does not affect convergent and divergent creative processes in healthy adults

被引:12
作者
Baas, Matthijs [1 ]
Boot, Nathalie [1 ]
van Gaal, Simon [1 ,2 ]
de Dreu, Carsten K. W. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Cools, Roshan [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, POB 15919, NL-1001 NK Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Expt Econ & Polit Decis Making CREED, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Creativity; Dopamine; Flexibility; Methylphenidate; ADHD; DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; WORKING-MEMORY; RECEPTOR AVAILABILITY; NOVELTY-SEEKING; DOPAMINE; COGNITION; PREDICTS; MODULATION; PERSONALITY; MODAFINIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116279
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
An increasing number of healthy people use methylphenidate, a psychostimulant that increases dopamine and noradrenaline transmission in the brain, to help them focus over extended periods of time. While methylphenidate has been shown to facilitate some cognitive functions, like focus and distractor-resistance, the same drug might also contribute to cognitive impairment, for example, in creativity. In this study, we investigated whether acute administration of a low oral dose (20 mg) of methylphenidate affected convergent and divergent creative processes in a sample of young healthy participants. Also, we explored whether such effects depended on individual differences in ADHD symptoms and working memory capacity. Contrary to our expectations, methylphenidate did not affect participants' creative performance on any of the tasks. Also, methylphenidate effects did not depend on individual differences in trait hyperactivity-impulsivity or baseline working memory capacity. Thus, although the effects of methylphenidate on creativity might be underestimated in our study due to several methodological factors, our findings do not suggest that methylphenidate impairs people's ability to be creative.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [61] Poll results: look who's doping
    Maher, Brendan
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7188) : 674 - 675
  • [62] Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
    Marquand, Andre F.
    De Simoni, Sara
    O'Daly, Owen G.
    Williams, Steven C. R.
    Mourao-Miranda, Janaina
    Mehta, Mitul A.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 36 (06) : 1237 - 1247
  • [63] The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task
    Marsh, RL
    Ward, TB
    Landau, JD
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1999, 27 (01) : 94 - 105
  • [64] The association between creativity and 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4)
    Mayseless, Naama
    Uzefovsky, Florina
    Shalev, Idan
    Ebstein, Richard P.
    Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [65] THE ASSOCIATIVE BASIS OF THE CREATIVE PROCESS
    MEDNICK, SA
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 69 (03) : 220 - 232
  • [66] Mehta MA, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20
  • [67] Modafinil: A review of neurochemical actions and effects on cognition
    Minzenberg, Michael J.
    Carter, Cameron S.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 33 (07) : 1477 - 1502
  • [68] The Effects of Modafinil on Convergent and Divergent Thinking of Creativity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mohamed, Ahmed Dahir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2016, 50 (04) : 252 - 267
  • [69] Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers
    Mueller, U.
    Rowe, J. B.
    Rittman, T.
    Lewis, C.
    Robbins, T. W.
    Sahakian, B. J.
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 64 : 490 - 495
  • [70] The Bright Side of Threatened Narcissism: Improved Performance Following Ego Threat
    Nevicka, Barbora
    Baas, Matthijs
    Ten Velden, Femke S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2016, 84 (06) : 809 - 823