Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation

被引:43
作者
Eidt, Colleen M. [1 ]
Pant, Laxmi P. [2 ,3 ]
Hickey, Gordon M. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, 21,111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Design & Rural Dev, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
关键词
Sub-Saharan Africa; rural livelihoods; subsistence; smallholders; sustainable food security; participatory development; sustainable agriculture; community engagement; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE; SYSTEMS; RESILIENCE; CONTRADICTION; INTEGRATION; TECHNOLOGY; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3390/su12020461
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret 'innovation' from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily on participatory modernization and commercialization initiatives to enhance productivity, access, and quality. However, existing social hierarchies may undermine the potential of such initiatives to promote inclusive and sustainable farmer-driven innovation. Focusing on the chronically food insecure smallholder agricultural systems operating in Yatta Sub-county, Eastern Kenya, this paper explores how power dynamics between stakeholders can influence, and can be influenced by, participatory agricultural innovation initiatives. Findings suggest that there are often significant disparities in access to, and control over, platform resources between smallholder farmers and other stakeholder groups, resulting in large asymmetries. We discuss how these power dynamics may increase the risk of agricultural intervention, further marginalizing already disempowered groups and reinforcing power hierarchies to the detriment of smallholders. This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the institutional contexts that facilitate and maintain relationships of power within agricultural innovation systems, as well as the complexities associated with promoting transformational agricultural innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice [J].
Ackermann, Fran ;
Eden, Colin .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2011, 44 (03) :179-196
[2]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[3]   Climate adaptation: Institutional response to environmental constraints, and the need for increased flexibility, participation, and integration of approaches [J].
Amaru, Stephanie ;
Chhetri, Netra B. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 39 :128-139
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Qualitative Research
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Regulatory Reform and Demand Creation
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AGR SECT DEV STRAT 2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The constitution of Kenya
[8]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[9]  
Ashby J.A., 1997, WHAT WE MEAN PARTICI
[10]   Transformational resilience thinking: putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience [J].
Bahadur, Aditya ;
Tanner, Thomas .
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2014, 26 (01) :200-214