A systematic approach towards mastering complexity through hybrid assembly planning

被引:0
作者
Foelling, Carsten [1 ]
Burggraef, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Siyuan [1 ]
Adlon, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Lab Machine Tools & Prod Engn WZL, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Siegen, Chair Int Prod Management & Engn, Siegen, Germany
关键词
Hybrid assembly planning; Assembly design; Complexity-based method selection; Integrative complexity measure; Complexity potential; Hybrid framework configuration; DECISION-MAKING; AGILE; METHODOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the face of increasingly agile product development, new challenges arise for assembly planning due to growing complexity. Within this paper, we show that the complexity-dependent combination of agile methods and traditionally plan-driven assembly planning procedures holds great potential for mastering planning complexity. Thus, a methodology towards hybrid assembly planning is elucidated with a focus on selecting dominant planning methods for specific planning scopes within this paper. Based on a detailed model of assembly planning as a system, the complexity requirements of different planning modules are determined. Therefore, an integrative complexity measure is developed to quantitatively operationalise complexity in a quasistatic-structural and a dynamic-functional complexity dimension. In order to identify dominant planning methods, the complexity potentials of agile and plan-driven methods are examined in an Analytic Hierarchy Process expert study with 22 participants. Within a decision model, dominant planning methods are selected for specific planning modules by matching the quantified complexity requirements with the complexity potentials of agile and plan-driven methods. Based on the systematic method selection, dominant planning methods for specific planning scopes can be tailored into a project specific hybrid process framework. The approach to hybrid assembly planning enables optimised planning results through the improved mastery of complexity. (c) 2022 CIRP.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 171
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Software Engineering and Agile Software Development
    Aitken, Ashley
    Ilango, Vishnu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 46TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, : 4751 - 4760
  • [2] Aizenman J., 2005, MANAGING EC VOLATILI, P45
  • [3] Anderson Lorin W., 2001, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1957, INTRO CYBERNETICS
  • [5] Baird A., 2012, Journal of Information Systems Education, V23
  • [6] Barlow JB, 2011, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V29
  • [7] Beer Stafford., 1959, CYBERNETICS MANAGEME
  • [8] Bertling M., 2018, ADV PRODUCTION RES P, P24
  • [9] Bliss C, 1998, SCHRIFTENREIHE UNTER, V35
  • [10] Observations on balancing discipline and agility
    Boehm, B
    Turner, R
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE AGILE DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2003, : 32 - 39