Tri-level thinking: models of three-way decision

被引:199
作者
Yao, Yiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Dept Comp Sci, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Three-way decision; Thinking in threes; Tri-level analysis; Tri-level thinking; Data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy; CONFLICT-ANALYSIS; CONCEPT LATTICE; ROUGH SET; SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; APPROXIMATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s13042-019-01040-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The underlying philosophy of three-way decision is thinking in threes, namely, understanding and processing a whole through three distinct and related parts. One can formulate many concrete models of three-way decision to account for different interpretations of the three parts. By interpreting the three parts as three levels, this paper investigates tri-level thinking to build concrete models of three-way decision. We examine some fundamental issues and basic ingredients of tri-level thinking. In accordance with the data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy, we present a perception-cognition-action (PCA) tri-level conceptual model that is applicable to studying intelligent data analytics, intelligent systems, and human understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 959
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ackoff R., 1989, DATA WISDOM, V16, P3
[2]   A three-way clustering approach for handling missing data using GTRS [J].
Afridi, Mohammad Khan ;
Azam, Nouman ;
Yao, JingTao ;
Alanazi, Eisa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2018, 98 :11-24
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, BIOETHICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Mathematical Theory of Communication
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Visual perception
[6]   Game-theoretic rough sets for recommender systems [J].
Azam, Nouman ;
Yao, JingTao .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 72 :96-107
[7]  
Backman B, 2005, THINKING 3S POWER 3
[8]   The numbers game [J].
Barany, Michael .
NEW SCIENTIST, 2011, 210 (2808) :43-45
[9]  
Boer C, 2014, THINKING 3S WE HUMAN
[10]  
Brown S, 1996, ADV CONSUM RES, V23, P43