Outcome of Osseointegrated Dental Implants in Double-Barrel and Vertically Distracted Fibula Osteoseptocutaneous Free Flaps for Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction

被引:32
作者
Chang, Yang-Ming
Wallace, Christopher Glenn
Hsu, Yueh-Min
Shen, Yu-Fu
Tsai, Chi-Yin
Wei, Fu-Chan
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Coll Med, Taipei 10591, Taiwan
关键词
LONG-TERM EVALUATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; OROMANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; ALVEOLAR BONE; ILIAC CREST; OSTEOGENESIS; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; GRAFTS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000623
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Osseointegrated dental implants in double-barrel, or single-barrel and then vertically distracted, fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flaps can achieve segmental mandibular reconstruction, dental rehabilitation, and premorbid facial height. However, it remains unknown which configuration provides better osseointegration outcomes. Methods: Between 2003 and 2009, all patients who underwent segmental mandibular defect reconstruction using vertical distraction osteogenesis of single-barrel fibula with secondary osseointegration (group A, 10 patients and 35 osseointegrated dental implants) or double-barrel fibula with primary osseointegration (group B, 13 patients and 36 osseointegrated dental implants) were evaluated prospectively for crown-implant ratios, mesial/distal marginal bone losses, and complications. In group B, 18 osseointegrated dental implants were surrounded by palatal mucosal grafts; the other retained fibula skin paddles. Results: Palatal mucosal grafts in group B improved mesial (p < 0.001) and distal (p < 0.001) marginal bone losses. Mesial marginal bone loss of group B with palatal mucosal grafts was better than that of group A (p < 0.05), despite higher crown-implant ratios in group A (p < 0.01). Mesial (p < 0.01) and distal (p < 0.05) marginal bone losses of group A were better than that of group B osseointegrated dental implants without palatal mucosal grafts. Complications in group A were common and complex, unlike group B. All patients completed dental rehabilitation. Conclusions: Osseointegration was adequate to complete dental rehabilitation in group B without palatal mucosal grafts, but was significantly better in group A, and significantly best in group B with palatal mucosal grafts. Given the complexity and frequency of complications in group A, the authors recommend the double-barrel configuration with osseointegrated dental implants for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction. Palatal mucosal grafts have a definite advantage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Bidez M W, 1992, J Oral Implantol, V18, P264
  • [2] Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap reconstruction with endosteal implants: An ideal treatment method for mandibular ameloblastoma
    Chana, JS
    Chang, YM
    Wei, FC
    Shen, YF
    Chan, CP
    Lin, HN
    Tsai, CY
    Jeng, SF
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (01) : 80 - 87
  • [3] One-stage, double-barrel fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap and immediate dental implants for functional and aesthetic reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects
    Chang, Yang-Ming
    Tsai, Chi-Ying
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [4] Dental Implant Outcome after Primary Implantation into Double-Barreled Fibula Osteoseptocutaneous Free Flap-Reconstructed Mandible
    Chang, Yang-Ming
    Wallace, Christopher G.
    Tsai, Chi-Ying
    Shen, Yu-Fu
    Hsu, Yueh-Min
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (06) : 1220 - 1228
  • [5] Use of waxing screws for accurate primary placement of endosteal implants in the vascularized fibular bone-reconstructed mandible
    Chang, YM
    Chana, JS
    Wei, FC
    Shen, YF
    Chan, CP
    Tsai, CY
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (05) : 1693 - 1696
  • [6] Chang YM, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P341
  • [7] Primary insertion of osseointegrated dental implants into fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap for mandible reconstruction
    Chang, YM
    Santamaria, E
    Wei, FC
    Chen, HC
    Chan, CP
    Shen, YF
    Hou, SP
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (03) : 680 - 688
  • [8] Evaluation of bone height in osseous free flap mandible reconstruction: An indirect measure of bone mass
    Disa, JJ
    Hidalgo, DA
    Cordeiro, PG
    Winters, RM
    Thaler, H
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (05) : 1371 - 1377
  • [9] FRODEL JL, 1993, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V92, P449, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199309000-00010
  • [10] Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Garcia, AG
    Martin, MS
    Vila, PG
    Maceiras, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (05) : 496 - 501