Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis: Contemporary results from a large single center study

ObjectiveTo compare the complication rates associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS). BackgroundCarotid stenosis is a well-known cause of stroke and increased mortality. The safety of carotid revascularization may be related to symptom status, medical comorbidities, use of embolic protection devices, as well as operator experience and these factors may vary across patient populations within a single operating center. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with carotid artery stenosis admitted to our hospital for carotid revascularization between January 1, 2007 and December 1, 2013. The primary end point was a composite endpoint of periprocedural death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). ResultsOf the 718 patients admitted for carotid revascularization 525 (73.1%) underwent CEA and 193 (26.9%) underwent CAS. Both groups demonstrated similar rates of the composite endpoint, MI, and death; the stenting group demonstrated a higher rate of stroke (4.2% vs. 1.3%; P=0.020). Adjusting for baseline medical comorbidities and symptom status mitigated this difference (P=0.091 and 0.113, respectively). When stratified by department performing CAS, there was a significant difference in the occurrence of stroke (P=0.033), which likewise disappeared in the multivariate regression analysis. ConclusionThe risk of the composite endpoint did not differ significantly between those undergoing CAS versus CEA. The stenting group demonstrated a higher rate of periprocedural stroke, which was also apparent when patients were stratified by stenting department. These differences were likely driven by variation in baseline medical comorbidities and symptom status. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.