Fusion Positron Emission/Computed Tomography Underestimates the Presence of Hilar Nodal Metastases in Patients With Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:18
作者
Carrillo, Sergio A.
Daniel, Vincent C.
Hall, Nathan
Hitchcock, Charles L.
Ross, Patrick, Jr.
Kassis, Edmund S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Thorac Surg, Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
FORTHCOMING 7TH EDITION; EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; TNM CLASSIFICATION; STAGING PROJECT; PET; MEDIASTINOSCOPY; THORACOSCOPY; DESCRIPTORS; PROPOSALS; REVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The 5-year survival for patients with resected stage II (N1) non-small cell lung cancer ranges from 40% to 55%. No data exist addressing the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with stage II disease. This is largely in part due to the lack of a reliable, minimally invasive method to assess hilar nodes. This study is aimed at determining the ability of fusion positron emission/computed tomography (PET/CT) to identify hilar metastases in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Methods. A retrospective review of surgically resected patients with fusion PET/CT within 30 days of resection was performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PET/CT in detecting hilar nodal metastases was calculated for a range of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax). Hilar nodes from patients with falsely positive PET/CT scans were analyzed for the presence of histoplasmosis. Additionally, the impact of hilar node size greater than 1 centimeter on the calculated values was assessed. Results. There were 119 patients evaluated. The number of lymph nodes resected ranged from 1 to 12 (X = 2.98). There was decreased sensitivity and increased specificity with higher SUVmax cutoff values. At the standard SUVmax value of 2.5, the sensitivity and specificity were only 48.5% and 80.2%. The addition of size of hilar node by CT led to a modest improvement in sensitivity at all SUVmax cutoff values. Conclusions. Fusion PET/CT lacks sensitivity and specificity in identifying hilar nodal metastasis in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Further prospective studies assessing the utility of PET/CT versus alternative sampling techniques are warranted. (Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1621-5) (C) 2012 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1625
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2015
  • [2] Meta-analysis of positron emission tomographic and computed tomographic imaging in detecting mediastinal lymph node metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Birim, Ö
    Kappetein, AP
    Stijnen, T
    Bogers, AJJC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (01) : 375 - 382
  • [3] Maximum standard uptake value of mediastinal lymph nodes on integrated FDG-PET-CT predicts pathology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    Cerfolio, Robert J.
    Klemm, Katrin M.
    Ojha, Buddhiwardhan
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 82 (02) : 417 - 423
  • [4] Fusion Positron Emission/Computed Tomography Underestimates the Presence of Hilar Nodal Metastases in Patients With Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Carrillo, Sergio A.
    Daniel, Vincent C.
    Hall, Nathan
    Hitchcock, Charles L.
    Ross, Patrick, Jr.
    Kassis, Edmund S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 93 (05) : 1621 - 1625
  • [5] The role of FDG-PET scan in staging patients with nonsmall cell carcinoma
    Cerfolio, RJ
    Ojha, B
    Bryant, AS
    Bass, CS
    Bartalucci, AA
    Mountz, JM
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (03) : 861 - 866
  • [6] Ratio of the maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET of the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes to the primary tumor may be a universal predictor of nodal malignancy in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer
    Cerfolio, Robert James
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 83 (05) : 1826 - 1830
  • [7] Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer
    Depierre, A
    Milleron, B
    Moro-Sibilot, D
    Chevret, S
    Quoix, E
    Lebeau, B
    Braun, D
    Breton, JL
    Lemarié, E
    Gouva, S
    Paillot, N
    Bréchot, JM
    Janicot, H
    Lebas, FX
    Terrioux, P
    Clavier, J
    Foucher, P
    Monchâtre, M
    Coëtmeur, D
    Level, MC
    Leclerc, P
    Blanchon, F
    Rodier, JM
    Thiberville, L
    Villeneuve, A
    Westeel, V
    Chastang, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) : 247 - 253
  • [8] Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: results of the MRC LU22/NVALT 2/EORTC 08012 multicentre randomised trial and update of systematic review
    Gilligan, David
    Nicolson, Marianne
    Smith, Ian
    Groen, Harry
    Dalesio, Otilia
    Goldstraw, Peter
    Hatton, Matthew
    Hopwood, Penelope
    Manegold, Christian
    Schramel, Franz
    Smit, Hans
    van Meerbeeck, Jan
    Nankivell, Matthew
    Parmar, Mahesh
    Pugh, Cheryl
    Stephens, Richard
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9577) : 1929 - 1937
  • [9] 18F-FDG PET for mediastinal staging of lung cancer:: Which SUV threshold makes sense?
    Hellwig, Dirk
    Graeter, Thomas P.
    Ukena, Dieter
    Groeschel, Andreas
    Sybrecht, Gerhard W.
    Schaefers, Hans-Joachim
    Kirsch, Carl-Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (11) : 1761 - 1766
  • [10] Application of the revised lung cancer staging system (IASLC Staging Project) to a cancer center population
    Kassis, Edmund S.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Bekele, B. Nebiyou
    Erasmus, Jeremy J.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Moran, Cesar A.
    Pisters, Katherine M.
    Rice, David C.
    Walsh, Garrett L.
    Roth, Jack A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 138 (02) : 412 - U201