Pareto Cone ε-Dominance: Improving Convergence and Diversity in Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Batista, Lucas S. [1 ]
Campelo, Felipe [1 ]
Guimaraes, Frederico G. [1 ]
Ramirez, Jaime A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Engn Eletr, BR-31720010 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
关键词
Evolutionary multiobjective optimization; evolutionary algorithms; epsilon-dominance; Pareto front; QUICK COMPUTATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Relaxed forms of Pareto dominance have been shown to be the most effective way in which evolutionary algorithms can progress towards the Pareto-optimal front with a widely spread distribution of solutions. A popular concept is the epsilon-dominance technique, which has been employed as an archive update strategy in some multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. In spite of the great usefulness of the epsilon-dominance concept, there are still difficulties in computing an appropriate value of epsilon that provides the desirable number of nondominated points. Additionally, several viable solutions may be lost depending on the hypergrid adopted, impacting the convergence and the diversity of the estimate set. We propose the concept of cone epsilon-dominance, which is a variant of the epsilon-dominance, to overcome these limitations. Cone epsilon-dominance maintains the good convergence properties of epsilon-dominance, provides a better control over the resolution of the estimated Pareto front, and also performs a better spread of solutions along the front. Experimental validation of the proposed cone epsilon-dominance shows a significant improvement in the diversity of solutions over both the regular Pareto-dominance and the epsilon-dominance.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On cone characterizations of weak, proper and Pareto optimality in multiobjective optimization
    Kaisa Miettinen
    Marko M. Mäkelä
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2001, 53 : 233 - 245
  • [42] On cone characterizations of weak, proper and Pareto optimality in multiobjective optimization
    Miettinen, K
    Mäkelä, MM
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2001, 53 (02) : 233 - 245
  • [43] On Benchmarking Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Algorithms
    Shavarani, Seyed Mahdi
    Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel
    Knowles, Joshua
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 28 (04) : 1084 - 1098
  • [44] An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization
    Fonseca, Carlos M.
    Fleming, Peter J.
    EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1995, 3 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [45] Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms on complex networks
    Kirley, Michael
    Stewart, Robert
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4403 : 81 - +
  • [46] A Strengthened Dominance Relation Considering Convergence and Diversity for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization
    Tian, Ye
    Cheng, Ran
    Zhang, Xingyi
    Su, Yansen
    Jin, Yaochu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 23 (02) : 331 - 345
  • [47] Benchmarking evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms
    Mersmann, Olaf
    Trautmann, Heike
    Naujoks, Boris
    Weihs, Claus
    2010 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2010,
  • [48] On Utilizing Infeasibility in Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms
    Hanne, Thomas
    MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING AND GOAL PROGRAMMING: THEORETICAL RESULTS AND PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 618 : 113 - 122
  • [49] Convergence Versus Diversity in Multiobjective Optimization
    Jiang, Shouyong
    Yang, Shengxiang
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN XIV, 2016, 9921 : 984 - 993
  • [50] An Empirical Study of Aggregation Operators with Pareto Dominance in Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm
    Ojha, Muneendra
    Singh, Krishna Pratap
    Chakraborty, Pavan
    Verma, Shekhar
    Pandey, Purnendu Shekhar
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2017, 63 (04) : 493 - 503