Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review

被引:210
作者
Iles, R. A. [1 ]
Davidson, M. [1 ]
Taylor, N. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Physiotherapy, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/oem.2007.036046
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic (lasting less than 3 months) non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Methods: A systematic review of prognostic studies was carried out. Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and PEDro electronic bibliographic databases up to April 2006 were searched. Included studies took baseline measures in the non-chronic phase of NSLBP (ie, within 3 months of onset), included at least one psychosocial variable and studied a sample in which at least 75% of participants had NSLBP. Baseline measures had to be used to predict at least one work-specific outcome. Results: The search identified 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. From these studies there is strong evidence that recovery expectation is predictive of work outcome and that depression, job satisfaction and stress/psychological strain are not predictive of work outcome. There is moderate evidence that fear avoidance beliefs are predictive of work outcome and that anxiety is not predictive of work outcome. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether compensation or locus of control are predictive of work outcome. Conclusions: To predict work outcome in non-chronic NSLBP, psychosocial assessment should focus on recovery expectation and fear avoidance. More research is needed to determine the best method of measuring these constructs and to determine how to intervene when a worker has low recovery expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Screening to Identify People at Risk of Long-term Incapacity for Work
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The back pain revolution
[3]   Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces [J].
Baril, R ;
Clarke, J ;
Friesen, M ;
Stock, S ;
Cole, D .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (11) :2101-2114
[4]   Screening to identify patients at risk - Profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention [J].
Boersma, K ;
Linton, SJ .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 21 (01) :38-43
[5]   IDENTIFYING PATIENTS AT RISK OF BECOMING DISABLED BECAUSE OF LOW-BACK-PAIN - THE VERMONT REHABILITATION ENGINEERING CENTER PREDICTIVE MODEL [J].
CATSBARIL, WL ;
FRYMOYER, JW .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :605-607
[6]  
Cole DC, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V166, P749
[7]   CLINICAL COURSE AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - AN INCEPTION COHORT STUDY IN PRIMARY-CARE PRACTICE [J].
COSTE, J ;
DELECOEUILLERIE, G ;
DELARA, AC ;
LEPARC, JM ;
PAOLAGGI, JB .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6928) :577-580
[8]   Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature [J].
Crook, J ;
Milner, R ;
Schultz, IZ ;
Stringer, B .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 12 (04) :277-295
[9]   Work demands, job insecurity and sickness absence from work. How productive is the new, flexible labour force? [J].
D'Souza, Rennie M. ;
Strazdins, Lyndall ;
Broom, Dorothy H. ;
Rodgers, Bryan ;
Berry, Helen L. .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 30 (03) :205-212
[10]  
de Jonge J, 2000, J Occup Health Psychol, V5, P256, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.256