Comparing the Use of Terrestrial LiDAR Scanners and Pin Profilers for Deriving Agricultural Roughness Statistics

被引:8
作者
Chabot, Melanie [1 ]
Lindsay, John [1 ]
Rowlandson, Tracy [1 ]
Berg, Aaron A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
INTEGRAL-EQUATION MODEL; SOIL-MOISTURE; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; BARE SOIL; SAR DATA; SEMIEMPIRICAL CALIBRATION; LASER SCANNER; RADAR IMAGES; SCATTERING; INVERSION;
D O I
10.1080/07038992.2018.1461559
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Adequate descriptions of soil surface roughness are vital for the accurate retrieval of soil moisture maps from remote sensing products. Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) have the potential to offer a more comprehensive method of measuring surface roughness than traditional techniques, but are underused in this application. This research examines the use of TLSs for measuring the surface roughness of bare agricultural fields in Elora, Ontario. Through the development and application of an innovative plug-in called Roughness from Point Cloud Profiles (RPCP), this research compares TLS surface roughness characterizations to those derived from a pin profiler. In most cases, the root mean square height (RMSH) measurements obtained from the pin profiler are within 1.5 cm of those obtained from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Nearly 90% of the l measurements obtained from the TLS were >5 cm larger than those from the pin profiler. Discrepancies between pin profiler and TLS roughness characterizations can be partially explained by LiDAR shadowing in some cases, but are likely caused by other factors such as de-trending techniques, profile length, and profile orientation. The results of this research illustrate roughness variations across fields and between roughness profile orientations according to tillage structures.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 168
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Sensitivity of C-band SAR polarimetric variables to unvegetated agricultural fields [J].
Adams, Justin R. ;
Berg, Aaron A. ;
McNairn, Heather ;
Merzouki, Amine .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 39 (01) :1-16
[2]   Retrieving soil moisture over bare soil from ERS 1 synthetic aperture radar data: Sensitivity analysis based on a theoretical surface scattering model and field data [J].
Altese, E ;
Bolognani, O ;
Mancini, M ;
Troch, PA .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (03) :653-661
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CloudCompare (Version 2.10)
[4]   Toward an Operational Bare Soil Moisture Mapping Using TerraSAR-X Data Acquired Over Agricultural Areas [J].
Aubert, Maelle ;
Baghdadi, Nicolas N. ;
Zribi, Mehrez ;
Ose, Kenji ;
El Hajj, Mahmoud ;
Vaudour, Emmanuelle ;
Gonzalez-Sosa, Enrique .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 6 (02) :900-916
[5]   Relationship between profile length and roughness variables for natural surfaces [J].
Baghdadi, N ;
Paillou, P ;
Grandjean, G ;
Dubois, P ;
Davidson, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (17) :3375-3381
[6]   An empirical calibration of the integral equation model based on SAR data, soil moisture and surface roughness measurement over bare soils [J].
Baghdadi, N ;
King, C ;
Chanzy, A ;
Wigneron, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 23 (20) :4325-4340
[7]   Semi-empirical calibration of the IEM backscattering model using radar images and moisture and roughness field measurements [J].
Baghdadi, N ;
Gherboudj, I ;
Zribi, M ;
Sahebi, M ;
King, C ;
Bonn, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (18) :3593-3623
[8]  
Baghdadi N, 2016, LAND SURFACE REMOTE SENSING IN CONTINENTAL HYDROLOGY, P1
[9]   Semiempirical Calibration of the Integral Equation Model for SAR Data in C-Band and Cross Polarization Using Radar Images and Field Measurements [J].
Baghdadi, Nicolas ;
Abou Chaaya, Jad ;
Zribi, Mehrez .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2011, 8 (01) :14-18
[10]   Multifrequency soil moisture inversion from SAR measurements with the use of IEM [J].
Bindlish, R ;
Barros, AP .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 71 (01) :67-88