Farm income and its taxation

被引:1
作者
Podstawka, Marian [1 ]
Podstawka, Lukasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst, Inst Agr & Food Econ, Dept Finance & Risk Management, Ul Swietokrzyska 20, PL-00002 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Fac Econ, Inst Econ & Finance, Warsaw, Poland
来源
EKONOMIA I PRAWO-ECONOMICS AND LAW | 2021年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
agricultural income; agricultural tax; FADN;
D O I
10.12775/EiP.2021.036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Motivation: It is increasingly common to hear the opinion that farm income should be taxed with income tax, just like other types of economic activity. Currently, the level of taxation of farm income is low. As the economic power of the farm increases, the level of taxation of its income decreases. Over the years 2014-2019, no variation can be observed in the level of taxation of farm income. Certain simplified attempts to record economic events on farms, due to the fact that they receive all kinds of subsidies, are being gradually introduced by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. The time has come to carry out a reliable assessment of the income situation of farms. The calculation of income is important for making management decisions on the farm so as to optimise the production structure, costs, etc. Aim: The objective of the study is to assess the level of income among FADN farms in various economic classes, to assess the level of taxation of income of these farms, and to present the problems related to a potential change in the taxation of agricultural activities. The study aims to show the problems related to calculating income on farms and to present the advantages and disadvantages of the existing taxes paid by farmers. Results: The result of the study is a proposal regarding tax rates in agriculture. According to the author, in the case of taxation of farm income, in order to maintain its current level of taxation, the tax rate should be 1-2%. If farm income were to be taxed, the tax rate, which would not increase the current tax burden, should be 2-5%.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 615
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Farm economic sustainability in the European Union: A pilot study
    O'Donoghue, Cathal
    Devisme, Simon
    Ryan, Mary
    Conneely, Ricky
    Gillespie, Patrick
    Vrolijk, Hans
    STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 118 (03): : 163 - 171
  • [22] Assessment of Farm Accountancy Data Network System in Croatia
    Juracak, J.
    Ocic, V
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2021, 27 (02): : 91 - 98
  • [23] Determinants of Total Farm Output Based on FADN Database
    Vlad, Ionela Mituko
    Stoian, Elena
    Tudor, Valentina
    Micu, Marius Mihai
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I - VI, 2015, 2015, : 2767 - 2773
  • [24] THE IMPACT OF SUBSIDIES ON AGRICULTURAL INCOME IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
    Ocic, V
    Grgic, Z.
    Lodeta, Batelja K.
    Bobic, Sakic B.
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2018, 24 (02): : 57 - 62
  • [25] THE INCOME SITUATION OF FARMS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES
    Sredzinska, Joanna
    HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 7 (1), 2017, 2017, : 814 - 820
  • [26] Analysis of resilience in Romanian rural farm areas by a quantitative approach
    Galluzzo, Nicola
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2020, 26 (01): : 16 - 22
  • [27] LITHUANIAN FAMILY FARM ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY: DOES THE INDICATOR MATTER?
    Dabkiene, Vida
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2019, VOL 2, 2019, : 202 - 209
  • [28] Evaluating the effects of interactive innovations at farm level: the potential of FADN
    Cristiano, Simona
    Proietti, Patrizia
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2019, 25 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [29] Government intervention in wildlife damage management: a bioeconomic analysis of wildlife damage compensation and taxation policies
    Xie Z.
    Journal of Bioeconomics, 2022, 24 (1) : 93 - 115
  • [30] On the comparative evaluation of agricultural income distributions in the European Union
    Allanson, P
    Hubbard, L
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 26 (01) : 1 - 17