Perceptual Interactions Between Electrodes Using Focused and Monopolar Cochlear Stimulation

被引:25
作者
Marozeau, Jeremy [1 ,2 ]
McDermott, Hugh J. [1 ,3 ]
Swanson, Brett A. [4 ]
McKay, Colette M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bion Inst, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Hearing Syst Grp, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med Bion, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2015年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
cochlear implant; psychophysics; stimulation strategies; electrical field; PSYCHOPHYSICAL TUNING CURVES; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPLANT USERS; CHANNEL INTERACTION; PLACE SPECIFICITY; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; AUDITORY-NERVE; TRIPOLAR; HEARING; NOISE;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-015-0511-2
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In today's cochlear implant (CI) systems, the monopolar (MP) electrode configuration is the most commonly used stimulation mode, requiring only a single current source. However, with an implant that will allow simultaneous activation of multiple independent current sources, it is possible to implement an all-polar (AP) stimulation mode designed to create a focused electrical field. The goal of this experiment was to study the potential benefits of this all-polar mode for reducing uncontrolled electrode interactions compared with the monopolar mode. The five participants who took part in the study were implanted with a research device that was connected via a percutaneous connector to a benchtop stimulator providing 22 independent current sources. The perceptual effects of the AP mode were tested in three experiments. In Experiment 1, the current level difference between loudness-matched sequential and simultaneous stimuli composed of 2 spatially separated pulse trains was measured as function of the electrode separation. Results indicated a strong current-summation interaction for simultaneous stimuli in the MP mode for separations up to at least 4.8 mm. No significant interaction was found in the AP mode beyond a separation of 2.4 mm. In Experiment 2, a forward-masking paradigm was used with fixed equally loud probes in AP and MP modes, and AP maskers presented on different electrode positions. Results indicated a similar spatial masking pattern between modes. In Experiment 3, subjects were asked to discriminate between across-electrode temporal delays. It was hypothesized that discrimination would decrease with electrode separation faster in AP compared to MP modes. However, results showed no difference between the two modes. Overall, the results indicated that the AP mode produced less current spread than MP mode but did not lead to a significant advantage in terms of spread of neuronal excitation at equally loud levels.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 412
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Koka, Kanthaiah
    Litvak, Leonid M.
    Finley, Charles C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (01) : 124 - 130
  • [22] Efficacy of a cochlear implant Simultaneous Analog Stimulation strategy coupled with a monopolar electrode configuration
    Xu, L
    Zwolan, TA
    Thompson, CS
    Pfingst, BE
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 114 (11) : 886 - 893
  • [23] Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays
    Landsberger, David M.
    Mertens, Griet
    Punte, Andrea Kleine
    Van De Heyning, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 135 (02) : EL75 - EL81
  • [24] Interactions between Auditory and Vestibular Modalities during Stimulation with a Combined Vestibular and Cochlear Prosthesis
    Phillips, James O.
    Ling, Leo
    Nowack, Amy
    Rebollar, Brenda
    Rubinstein, JayT.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2020, 25 (1-2) : 96 - 108
  • [25] Comparison of the electrical stimulation performance of four cochlear implant electrodes
    Choi, CTM
    Lai, WD
    Chen, YB
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2005, 41 (05) : 1920 - 1923
  • [26] Stimulation from Cochlear Implant Electrodes Assists with Recovery from Asymmetric Perceptual Tilt: Evidence from the Subjective Visual Vertical Test
    Gnanasegaram, Joshua J.
    Parkes, William J.
    Cushing, Sharon L.
    McKnight, Carmen L.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    Gordon, Karen A.
    FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [27] Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: Channel interactions
    Bierer, JA
    Middlebrooks, JC
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01): : 32 - 48
  • [28] Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Guerit, Francois
    Deeks, John M.
    Harland, Andrew
    Gransier, Robin
    Wouters, Jan
    de Rijk, Simone R.
    Bance, Manohar
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 22 (02): : 141 - 159
  • [29] Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel Interactions
    Julie Arenberg Bierer
    John C. Middlebrooks
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2004, 5 : 32 - 48
  • [30] Evaluation of the Relationship between the NRT-Ratio, Cochlear Anatomy, and Insertions Depth of Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes
    Mittmann, Philipp
    Rademacher, Grit
    Mutze, Sven
    Hassepass, Frederike
    Ernst, Arneborg
    Todt, Ingo
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015