Perspectives of residents on shared decision making in medication management: A qualitative study

被引:17
|
作者
Sawan, Mouna J. [1 ]
Jeon, Yun-Hee [2 ]
Hilmer, Sarah N. [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Pharm Sch, Fac Med & Hlth, Rm N347,Pharm & Bank Bldg A15, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Nursing Sch, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal North Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst Med Res, Clin Pharmacol & Aged Care, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
关键词
decision making; medications; patient-physician communication; deprescribing; long-term care; patient education; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICINES; HEALTH LOCUS; OLDER-ADULTS; BARRIERS; FACILITATORS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610222000205
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Shared decision making is the process in which the person, their representative, and health care professional share information with each other, participate in the decision-making process, and agree on a course of action. At present, very little is known about shared decision making (SDM) in medication management from the perspective of long-term care facility residents. The objective of this study was to identify residents' beliefs, motivation, and aspects of the environment that facilitate or impede SDM. Design: A qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, and data analysis was carried out using a thematic approach. Setting: Six long-term care facilities in Sydney, Australia. Participants: Thirty-one residents. Results: Enablers to resident involvement in SDM were resident beliefs in exercising their right to take part in medication-related decisions, preference to maintain control over decisions, and motivation to raise concern about medication. Residents were not motivated to be involved in SDM if they believed they had no control over life circumstance, perceived that medications were necessary, or experienced no problems with their medications. Participation in SDM was hindered by limitations in opportunities for resident involvement, engagement with staff and primary care physician to discuss issues related to medications, and continuity of care with their regular physician. Conclusion: This study highlights that the residents' beliefs in control over decisions and concerns about medication are a significant function of the SDM process. It is important that residents are given the choice to take part in SDM, their beliefs and values regarding SDM are understood, and the culture of the care facility respects residents' right to participate in SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 939
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perceptions of shared decision making in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative analysis
    Blum, Livnat
    Jarach, Carlotta Micaela
    Ellen, Moriah E.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 115
  • [42] Participation in decision-making about medication: A qualitative analysis of medication adherence
    Inder, Maree
    Lacey, Cameron
    Crowe, Marie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 28 (01) : 181 - 189
  • [43] Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
    Haugom, Espen W.
    Stensrud, Bjorn
    Beston, Gro
    Ruud, Torleif
    Landheim, Anne S.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [44] Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom
    Resnicow, Ken
    Catley, Delwyn
    Goggin, Kathy
    Hawley, Sarah
    Williams, Geoffrey C.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2022, 42 (06) : 755 - 764
  • [45] Trust and shared decision-making among individuals with multiple myeloma: A qualitative study
    Whitney, Robin L.
    White, Anne Elizabeth Clark
    Rosenberg, Aaron S.
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    Kim, Katherine K.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22): : 8040 - 8057
  • [46] Shared Decision Making, Contextualized
    Ferrer, Robert L.
    Gill, James M.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 11 (04) : 303 - 305
  • [47] Shared decision making in psychiatry
    Hamann, J
    Leucht, S
    Kissling, W
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 107 (06) : 403 - 409
  • [48] Acceptance of shared decision making with reference to an electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) and its association to decision making in patients: an evaluation study
    Hirsch, Oliver
    Keller, Heidemarie
    Krones, Tanja
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
  • [49] Roles, processes, and outcomes of interprofessional shared decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit: A qualitative study
    Dunn, Sandra I.
    Cragg, Betty
    Graham, Ian D.
    Medves, Jennifer
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2018, 32 (03) : 284 - 294
  • [50] Information needs in vascular access decision-making: A qualitative study of patient and clinical stakeholder perspectives
    Stevenson, Karen
    Meiklem, Ramsay
    Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley
    Thomson, Peter
    Dunlop, Mark
    Martin, Laura
    Jones, Catrin
    Kingsmore, David
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2025,