Hotspot Scenario Analysis: Comparative Streamlined LCA Approaches for Green Supply Chain and Procurement Decision Making

被引:26
作者
Pelton, Rylie E. O. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smith, Timothy M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Inst Environm Northstar Initiat Sustainable Enter, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Bioprod & Biosyst Engn, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
environmental performance measurement; environmental procurement; environmental strategy; green supply chain management; industrial ecology; streamlined life cycle assessment (SLCA); LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasingly, organizations are working to reduce the environmental footprint of their supply chains. The use of environmentally preferable purchasing criteria is one strategy organizations use to address this goal. However, evaluating the environmental performance of these criteria (e.g., recycled content, biodegradable, renewable, and so on) has remained elusive. Life cycle assessment (LCA) can measure the impact reduction potential of sourcing strategies. However, full process-based LCAs are time-consuming and costly across multiple criteria of thousands of products and inputs purchased in an organizational setting. A streamlined hotspot methodology is presented using a combination of environmentally extended economic input-output (EEIO) approaches and extant literature to identify hotspots in which to constrain a parameterized process-based LCA. A case study of breakfast cereal manufacturing is developed to (1) assess the efficiencies associated with the hotspotting approach and (2) demonstrate its applicability in generating comparable decision signals of environmentally preferable sourcing criteria for procurement and supply-chain managers along the dimensions of global warming potential and water use.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 440
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Albano G.L., 2010, REV EC I, V1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, DOI DOI 10.3403/30151316.
[3]   Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when 'good enough' is best [J].
Bala, Alba ;
Raugei, Marco ;
Benveniste, Gabriela ;
Gazulla, Cristina ;
Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (05) :489-498
[4]  
BARE JC, 2003, J IND ECOLOGY, V0006
[5]  
Berry M., 2012, Toward sustainability: The roles and limitations of certification
[6]  
Bower J., 2011, ENV PROD DECL EPDS A
[7]   Life Cycle Assessment of Second Generation Bioethanols Produced From Scandinavian Boreal Forest Resources A Regional Analysis for Middle Norway [J].
Bright, Ryan M. ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 13 (04) :514-531
[8]   ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PURCHASING: WHO IS DOING WHAT IN THE UNITED STATES? [J].
Coggburn, Jerrell D. ;
Rahm, Dianne .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2005, 5 (01) :23-53
[9]  
Cox R, 2011, OPENIO DEV TRANSP FU
[10]   Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method [J].
Crawford, Robert H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :496-506