Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae)

被引:50
作者
Ringelberg, Jens J. [1 ]
Koenen, Erik J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Iganci, Joao R. [3 ,4 ]
de Queiroz, Luciano P. [5 ]
Murphy, Daniel J. [6 ]
Gaudeul, Myriam [7 ]
Bruneau, Anne [8 ,9 ]
Luckow, Melissa [10 ]
Lewis, Gwilym P. [11 ]
Hughes, Colin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Systemat & Evolutionary Bot, Zollikerstr 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Evolutionary Biol & Ecol, Fac Sci, Campus Solbosch CP 160-12,Ave Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Fed Pelotas, Inst Biol, Campus Univ Capao do Leao, BR-96010900 Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Bot, Ave Bento Goncalves 9500, BR-91501970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Feira de Santana, Dept Ciencias Biol, Ave Transnordestina S-N, BR-44036900 Feira De Santana, BA, Brazil
[6] Royal Bot Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] MNHN CNRS SU EPHE UA, Inst Systemat Evolut Biodiversite ISYEB, 57 Rue Cuvier,CP 39, F-75231 Paris 05, France
[8] Univ Montreal, Inst Rech Biol Vegetale, 4101 Sherbrooke St E, Montreal, PQ H1X 2B2, Canada
[9] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, 4101 Sherbrooke St E, Montreal, PQ H1X 2B2, Canada
[10] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Plant Biol Sect, 215 Garden Ave,Roberts Hall 260, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[11] Royal Bot Gardens, Accelerated Taxon Dept, Richmond TW9 3AE, Surrey, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fabaceae; generic delimitation; mimosoid clade; monophyly; morphological homoplasy; phylogenomics; MATK CODING SEQUENCE; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS; MIMOSOID CLADE; ACACIA-S.L; PSEUDOSENEGALIA FABACEAE; EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY; GENUS; CLASSIFICATION; MORPHOLOGY; INGEAE;
D O I
10.3897/phytokeys.205.85866
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Subfamily Caesalpinioideae with ca. 4,600 species in 152 genera is the second-largest subfamily of leg-umes (Leguminosae) and forms an ecologically and economically important group of trees, shrubs and lianas with a pantropical distribution. Despite major advances in the last few decades towards aligning genera with clades across Caesalpinioideae, generic delimitation remains in a state of considerable flux, especially across the mimosoid clade. We test the monophyly of genera across Caesalpinioideae via phylog- enomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes sequenced via targeted enrichment (Hybseq) for 420 species and 147 of the 152 genera currently recognised in the subfamily. We show that 22 genera are non-monophyletic or nested in other genera and that non-monophyly is concentrated in the mimosoid clade where ca. 25% of the 90 genera are found to be non-monophyletic. We suggest two main reasons for this pervasive generic non-monophyly: (i) extensive morphological homoplasy that we document here for a handful of important traits and, particularly, the repeated evolution of distinctive fruit types that were historically emphasised in delimiting genera and (ii) this is an artefact of the lack of pantropical taxonomic syntheses and sampling in previous phylogenies and the consequent failure to identify clades that span the Old World and New World or conversely amphi-Atlantic genera that are non-monophyletic, both of which are critical for delimiting genera across this large pantropical clade. Finally, we discuss taxon delimitation in the phylogenomic era and especially how assessing patterns of gene tree conflict can provide additional in-sights into generic delimitation. This new phylogenomic framework provides the foundations for a series of papers reclassifying genera that are presented here in Advances in Legume Systematics (ALS) 14 Part 1, for establishing a new higher-level phylogenetic tribal and clade-based classification of Caesalpinioideae that is the focus of ALS14 Part 2 and for downstream analyses of evolutionary diversification and biogeography of this important group of legumes which are presented elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 58
页数:56
相关论文
共 166 条
  • [111] Re-circumscription of the mimosoid genus Entada including new combinations for all species of the phylogenetically nested Elephantorrhiza (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade)
    O'Donnell, Shawn A.
    Ringelberg, Jens J.
    Lewis, Gwilym P.
    [J]. PHYTOKEYS, 2022, (205) : 99 - 145
  • [112] Generic delimitation and phylogenetic uncertainty: an example from a group that has undergone an explosive radiation
    Orthia, LA
    Cook, LG
    Crisp, MD
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 2005, 18 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [113] PAUL S R, 1979, Feddes Repertorium, V90, P155
  • [114] Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life
    Pease, James B.
    Brown, Joseph W.
    Walker, Joseph F.
    Hinchliff, Cody E.
    Smith, Stephen A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2018, 105 (03) : 385 - 403
  • [115] Re-establishment of the genus Pseudalbizzia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): the New World species formerly placed in Albizia
    Peraza, Gabriela Aviles
    Koenen, Erik J. M.
    Riina, Ricarda
    Hughes, Colin E.
    Ringelberg, Jens J.
    Fernandez-Concha, German Carnevali
    Morillo, Ivon Mercedes Ramirez
    Itza, Lilia Lorena Can
    Tamayo-Cen, Ivan
    Prado, Jorge Humberto Ramirez
    Cornejo, Xavier
    Mattapha, Sawai
    Stefano, Rodrigo Duno de
    [J]. PHYTOKEYS, 2022, (205) : 371 - 400
  • [116] What to do with Hibiscus?: A proposed nomenclatural resolution for a large and well known genus of Malvaceae and comments on paraphyly
    Pfeil, BE
    Crisp, MD
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 2005, 18 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [117] Phillipson PB, 2022, NEW NATURAL HIST MAD
  • [118] Polhill R. M., 1981, Advances in legume systematics. Part 1 [Polhill, R.M.
  • [119] Raven, P.H. (Editors)]., P1
  • [120] Polhill R.M., 1994, Phytochemical Dictionary of the Leguminosae, pxxxv