The Utility of Short-Interval Follow-Up for Baseline High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:1
作者
Shergill, Ravi [1 ]
Osman, Heba [2 ]
Al-Douri, Faten [3 ]
Ramonas, Milita [4 ]
Al Duwaiki, Suad [3 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2020年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
breast MRI; high risk; screening; breast cancer; BI-RADS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; 3; LESIONS; WOMEN; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0846537119895752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer undergo annual screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at age 30. A proportion of these patients are subsequently required to undergo short-interval follow-up MRI 6 months after their baseline examination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility and outcome of these short-interval follow-up examinations in this population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 523 patients who received their baseline high-risk breast screening MRI at our institution between 2013 and 2017. The proportion of patients who received a short-interval follow-up MRI at 6 months was recorded. The findings at baseline and follow-up MRI were recorded, as well as the outcomes and results of any interventions performed. Results: Ninety-six (17.6%) patients (age range: 25-67, mean age: 41) received a short-interval follow-up MRI following their baseline screening examination. Indications for follow-up included moderate to marked background parenchymal enhancement, nonmass enhancement, and likely benign enhancing mass. Of the 92 patients, 5 (5.4%) went on to have a biopsy, with none revealing a malignant pathology. The remainder either returned to routine screening (91.3%) or received further imaging in the form of ultrasound or additional follow-up MRI (3.3%). Conclusion: Short-interval follow-up breast MRI in high-risk patients after a baseline screening study with likely benign findings is unlikely to yield clinically significant findings. This retrospective study can be considered a starting point for additional future work looking at the rate, indications, and yield of short-interval follow-up following baseline high-risk screening breast MRI studies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis [J].
Gareth, Evans D. ;
Nisha, Kesavan ;
Yit, Lim ;
Soujanye, Gadde ;
Emma, Hurley ;
Massat, Nathalie J. ;
Maxwell, Anthony J. ;
Sarah, Ingham ;
Rosalind, Eeles ;
Leach, Martin O. ;
Anthony, Howell ;
Stephen, Duffy .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 145 (03) :663-672
[42]   Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-Up Examinations After a Probably Benign Assessment: Is Clinical Practice Consistent With BI-RADS Guidance? [J].
Bowles, Erin J. Aiello ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Elmore, Joann G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) :1152-1159
[43]   Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women [J].
Rahman, W. Tania ;
Helvie, Mark A. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 83 :3-14
[44]   Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the screening and follow-up of high-risk individuals for familial pancreatic cancer [J].
Lorenzo, Diane ;
Rebours, Vinciane ;
Maire, Frederique ;
Palazzo, Maxime ;
Gonzalez, Jean-Michel ;
Vullierme, Marie-Pierre ;
Aubert, Alain ;
Hammel, Pascal ;
Levy, Philippe ;
de Mestier, Louis .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (34) :5082-5096
[45]   Prenatal follow-up of high-risk pregnancy in the public service [J].
Medeiros, Fabiana Fontana ;
de Lemos Santos, Isabel Dayana ;
Pimenta Ferrari, Rosangela Aparecida ;
Serafim, Deise ;
Maciel, Sandra Mara ;
Maciel Cardelli, Alexandrina Aparecida .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2019, 72 :204-211
[46]   Does Medicare-eligible high-risk breast cancer screening MRI target the right women? [J].
Lo, Glen ;
McLaughlin, Aden ;
Jacques, Angela ;
Dhillon, Ravinder ;
Porter, Gareth ;
Jayaratne, Thilina ;
Bose, Sharmistha ;
Bourke, Anita .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (02) :220-228
[47]   Guidelines and recommendations for MRI in breast cancer follow-up: A review [J].
van Bodegraven, Eduard A. ;
van Raaij, Jeroen C. ;
Van Goethem, Mireille ;
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 218 :5-11
[48]   The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program [J].
S. Vreemann ;
A. Gubern-Merida ;
S. Lardenoije ;
P. Bult ;
N. Karssemeijer ;
K. Pinker ;
R. M. Mann .
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 :323-331
[49]   Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening High-risk Women: Comparison with the Full Clinical Protocol [J].
Osei, Kendrah, V ;
Mehta, Anita K. ;
Thigpen, Denise M. ;
Rapelyea, Jocelyn ;
Friedman, Steven ;
Brem, Rachel F. .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (02) :196-200
[50]   Development and evaluation of the screening performance of a low-cost high-risk screening strategy for breast cancer [J].
Huang, Yubei ;
Wang, Huan ;
Lyu, Zhangyan ;
Dai, Hongji ;
Liu, Peifang ;
Zhu, Ying ;
Song, Fengju ;
Chen, Kexin .
CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (09) :1375-1384