The Utility of Short-Interval Follow-Up for Baseline High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:1
作者
Shergill, Ravi [1 ]
Osman, Heba [2 ]
Al-Douri, Faten [3 ]
Ramonas, Milita [4 ]
Al Duwaiki, Suad [3 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2020年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
breast MRI; high risk; screening; breast cancer; BI-RADS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; 3; LESIONS; WOMEN; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0846537119895752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer undergo annual screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at age 30. A proportion of these patients are subsequently required to undergo short-interval follow-up MRI 6 months after their baseline examination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility and outcome of these short-interval follow-up examinations in this population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 523 patients who received their baseline high-risk breast screening MRI at our institution between 2013 and 2017. The proportion of patients who received a short-interval follow-up MRI at 6 months was recorded. The findings at baseline and follow-up MRI were recorded, as well as the outcomes and results of any interventions performed. Results: Ninety-six (17.6%) patients (age range: 25-67, mean age: 41) received a short-interval follow-up MRI following their baseline screening examination. Indications for follow-up included moderate to marked background parenchymal enhancement, nonmass enhancement, and likely benign enhancing mass. Of the 92 patients, 5 (5.4%) went on to have a biopsy, with none revealing a malignant pathology. The remainder either returned to routine screening (91.3%) or received further imaging in the form of ultrasound or additional follow-up MRI (3.3%). Conclusion: Short-interval follow-up breast MRI in high-risk patients after a baseline screening study with likely benign findings is unlikely to yield clinically significant findings. This retrospective study can be considered a starting point for additional future work looking at the rate, indications, and yield of short-interval follow-up following baseline high-risk screening breast MRI studies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   False-negative MRI breast screening in high-risk women [J].
Maxwell, A. J. ;
Lim, Y. Y. ;
Hurley, E. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Howell, A. ;
Gadde, S. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (03) :207-216
[32]   Automated Triage of Screening Breast MRI Examinations in High-Risk Women Using an Ensemble Deep Learning Model [J].
Bhowmik, Arka ;
Monga, Natasha ;
Belen, Kristin ;
Varela, Keitha ;
Sevilimedu, Varadan ;
Thakur, Sunitha B. ;
Martinez, Danny F. ;
Sutton, Elizabeth J. ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Eskreis-Winkler, Sarah .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2023, 58 (10) :710-719
[33]   Effect of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Cancer Risk Across Different High-Risk Patient Populations Undergoing Screening Breast MRI [J].
Sippo, Dorothy A. ;
Rutledge, Geoffrey M. ;
Burk, Kristine S. ;
Mercaldo, Sarah F. ;
Dontchos, Brian N. ;
Edmonds, Christine E. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (06) :1412-1418
[34]   Relationship between Background Parenchymal Enhancement on High-risk Screening MRI and Future Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Grimm, Lars J. ;
Saha, Ashirbani ;
Ghate, Sujata V. ;
Kim, Connie ;
Soo, Mary Scott ;
Yoon, Sora C. ;
Mazurowski, Maciej A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) :69-75
[35]   Self-reported barriers to screening breast MRI among women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Conley, Claire C. ;
Rodriguez, Jennifer D. ;
McIntyre, McKenzie ;
Brownstein, Naomi C. ;
Niell, Bethany L. ;
O'Neill, Suzanne C. ;
Vadaparampil, Susan T. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 202 (02) :345-355
[36]   New York State Breast Density Mandate: Follow-up Data With Screening Sonography [J].
Destounis, Stamatia ;
Arieno, Andrea ;
Morgan, Renee .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (12) :2511-2517
[37]   Long- versus short-interval follow-up of cytologically benign thyroid nodules: a prospective cohort study [J].
Medici, Marco ;
Liu, Xiaoyun ;
Kwong, Norra ;
Angell, Trevor E. ;
Marqusee, Ellen ;
Kim, Matthew I. ;
Alexander, Erik K. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2016, 14
[38]   Breast Cancer Screening in High-risk Women During Pregnancy and Lactation [J].
Portnow, Leah H. ;
Snider, Lauren C. ;
Bolivar, Kimberly E. ;
Bychkovsky, Brittany L. ;
Klehm, Margaret R. ;
Yeh, Eren D. ;
Gombos, Eva C. ;
Chikarmane, Sona A. .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (05) :508-519
[39]   Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Zha, Nanxi ;
Alabousi, Mostafa ;
Abdullah, Peri ;
Freitas, Vivianne ;
Linthorst, Rhys ;
Muhn, Narry ;
Alabousi, Abdullah .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (02) :92-98
[40]   Long- versus short-interval follow-up after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study [J].
He, Wei ;
Zheng, Yun ;
Zou, Ruhai ;
Shen, Jingxian ;
Yang, Junping ;
Qiu, Jiliang ;
Tao, Qiang ;
Liu, Wenwu ;
Yang, Zhiwen ;
Zhang, Yuanping ;
Li, Binkui ;
Yuan, Yunfei .
CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 38