The Utility of Short-Interval Follow-Up for Baseline High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:1
作者
Shergill, Ravi [1 ]
Osman, Heba [2 ]
Al-Douri, Faten [3 ]
Ramonas, Milita [4 ]
Al Duwaiki, Suad [3 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2020年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
breast MRI; high risk; screening; breast cancer; BI-RADS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; 3; LESIONS; WOMEN; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0846537119895752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer undergo annual screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at age 30. A proportion of these patients are subsequently required to undergo short-interval follow-up MRI 6 months after their baseline examination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility and outcome of these short-interval follow-up examinations in this population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 523 patients who received their baseline high-risk breast screening MRI at our institution between 2013 and 2017. The proportion of patients who received a short-interval follow-up MRI at 6 months was recorded. The findings at baseline and follow-up MRI were recorded, as well as the outcomes and results of any interventions performed. Results: Ninety-six (17.6%) patients (age range: 25-67, mean age: 41) received a short-interval follow-up MRI following their baseline screening examination. Indications for follow-up included moderate to marked background parenchymal enhancement, nonmass enhancement, and likely benign enhancing mass. Of the 92 patients, 5 (5.4%) went on to have a biopsy, with none revealing a malignant pathology. The remainder either returned to routine screening (91.3%) or received further imaging in the form of ultrasound or additional follow-up MRI (3.3%). Conclusion: Short-interval follow-up breast MRI in high-risk patients after a baseline screening study with likely benign findings is unlikely to yield clinically significant findings. This retrospective study can be considered a starting point for additional future work looking at the rate, indications, and yield of short-interval follow-up following baseline high-risk screening breast MRI studies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Screening Breast MR Imaging: Comparison of Interpretation of Baseline and Annual Follow-up Studies [J].
Abramovici, Gil ;
Mainiero, Martha B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (01) :85-91
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROTOCOLS SURVEILLAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], Breast Imaging Reporting & Data System
[4]   BI-RADS∼ 3 lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: is an initial short-interval follow-up necessary? [J].
Bahrs, Sonja D. ;
Baur, Astrid ;
Hattermann, Valerie ;
Hahn, Markus ;
Vogel, Ulrich ;
Claussen, Claus D. ;
Siegmann-Luz, Katja C. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (03) :260-265
[5]   Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-Up Examinations After a Probably Benign Assessment: Is Clinical Practice Consistent With BI-RADS Guidance? [J].
Bowles, Erin J. Aiello ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Elmore, Joann G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) :1152-1159
[6]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[7]   Effectiveness of Screening With Annual Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography: Results of the Initial Screen From the Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program [J].
Chiarelli, Anna M. ;
Prummel, Maegan V. ;
Muradali, Derek ;
Majpruz, Vicky ;
Horgan, Meaghan ;
Carroll, June C. ;
Eisen, Andrea ;
Meschino, Wendy S. ;
Shumak, Rene S. ;
Warner, Ellen ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (21) :2224-2230
[8]   Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas [J].
Chikarmane, Sona A. ;
Michaels, Aya Y. ;
Giess, Catherine S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (05) :1178-1184
[9]   Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management [J].
Chikarmane, Sona A. ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. ;
Poole, Patricia S. ;
Sippo, Dorothy A. ;
Giess, Catherine S. .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) :707-715
[10]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Impact on Diagnostic Performance [J].
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Liu, Franklin ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Gutierrez, Robert L. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) :W373-W380