The Utility of Short-Interval Follow-Up for Baseline High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:1
|
作者
Shergill, Ravi [1 ]
Osman, Heba [2 ]
Al-Douri, Faten [3 ]
Ramonas, Milita [4 ]
Al Duwaiki, Suad [3 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2020年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
breast MRI; high risk; screening; breast cancer; BI-RADS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; 3; LESIONS; WOMEN; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0846537119895752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer undergo annual screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at age 30. A proportion of these patients are subsequently required to undergo short-interval follow-up MRI 6 months after their baseline examination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility and outcome of these short-interval follow-up examinations in this population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 523 patients who received their baseline high-risk breast screening MRI at our institution between 2013 and 2017. The proportion of patients who received a short-interval follow-up MRI at 6 months was recorded. The findings at baseline and follow-up MRI were recorded, as well as the outcomes and results of any interventions performed. Results: Ninety-six (17.6%) patients (age range: 25-67, mean age: 41) received a short-interval follow-up MRI following their baseline screening examination. Indications for follow-up included moderate to marked background parenchymal enhancement, nonmass enhancement, and likely benign enhancing mass. Of the 92 patients, 5 (5.4%) went on to have a biopsy, with none revealing a malignant pathology. The remainder either returned to routine screening (91.3%) or received further imaging in the form of ultrasound or additional follow-up MRI (3.3%). Conclusion: Short-interval follow-up breast MRI in high-risk patients after a baseline screening study with likely benign findings is unlikely to yield clinically significant findings. This retrospective study can be considered a starting point for additional future work looking at the rate, indications, and yield of short-interval follow-up following baseline high-risk screening breast MRI studies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Baseline Screening Breast MRI: Impact on Biopsy Rate and Short-Interval Follow-Up
    Hambly, Niamh M.
    Liberman, Laura
    Dershaw, D. David
    Brennan, Sandra
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 218 - 224
  • [2] BI-RADS∼ 3 lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: is an initial short-interval follow-up necessary?
    Bahrs, Sonja D.
    Baur, Astrid
    Hattermann, Valerie
    Hahn, Markus
    Vogel, Ulrich
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Siegmann-Luz, Katja C.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (03) : 260 - 265
  • [3] Frequency and Determinants of a Short-Interval Follow-up Recommendation After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram
    Pelletier, Eric
    Daigle, Jean-Marc
    Defay, Fannie
    Major, Diane
    Guertin, Marie-Helene
    Brisson, Jacques
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2016, 67 (04): : 322 - 329
  • [4] Utility and Outcomes of Preoperative Screening Breast MRI for Planned Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in High-Risk Patients
    Taliaferro, Andrew S.
    Price, Elissa R.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Wong, Jasmine M.
    Balassanian, Ronald
    Fay, Jill S.
    Freimanis, Rita, I
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [5] Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Abraham, Linn
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (05) : 1200 - 1208
  • [6] Update on Screening Breast MRI in High-Risk Women
    Boetes, C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 18 (02) : 241 - +
  • [7] Update on Screening Breast MRI in High-Risk Women
    Boetes, C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 38 (01) : 149 - +
  • [8] Breast Cancer Detection with Short-Interval Follow-up Compared with Return to Annual Screening in Patients with Benign Stereotactic or US-guided Breast Biopsy Results
    Johnson, Jason M.
    Johnson, Alisa K.
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Geller, Berta M.
    Hotaling, Elise N.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [9] An Alternative Approach to Selecting Patients for High-risk Screening with Breast MRI
    Hollingsworth, Alan B.
    Stough, Rebecca G.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (02): : 192 - 197
  • [10] Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast
    de Kermadec, E.
    Thomassin, I
    Darai, E.
    Kolanska, K.
    Chabbert-Buffet, N.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (12): : 923 - 929