Timing is everything: A technology transition framework for regulatory and market readiness levels

被引:38
作者
Kobos, Peter H. [1 ]
Malczynski, Leonard A. [2 ]
Walker, La Tonya N. [3 ]
Borns, David J. [4 ]
Klise, Geoffrey T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Water Power Technol Dept, POB 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[2] Sandia Natl Labs, Policy & Decis Analyt Dept, POB 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[3] Sandia Natl Labs, Energy Water Syst Integrat Dept, POB 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[4] Sandia Natl Labs, Geotechnol & Engn Dept, POB 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[5] Sandia Natl Labs, Wind Energy Dept, POB 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
关键词
Technology adoption; Technological progress; Regulatory feedback; Market adoption; Innovation; Market diffusion; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS; DECISION-MAKING; CARBON CAPTURE; POWER-PLANTS; CO2; CAPTURE; LOCK-IN; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Meeting technology-based policy goals without sufficient lead time may present several technology, regulatory and market-based challenges due to the speed of technological adoption in existing and emerging markets. Installing incremental amounts of technologies, e.g., cleaner fossil, renewable or transformative energy technologies throughout the coming decades, may prove to be a more attainable goal than a radical and immediate change the year before a policy goal is set to be in place. This notion of steady installation growth over acute installations of technology to meet policy goals is the core topic of discussion for this research. This research operationalizes this notion by developing the theoretical underpinnings of regulatory and market acceptance delays by building upon the common Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework and offers two new additions to the research community. The Regulatory Readiness Level (RRL) and Market Readiness Level (MRL) frameworks were developed. These components, collectively called the Technology, Regulatory and Market (TRM) readiness level framework allow one to build new constraints into existing Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs). A system dynamics model was developed to illustrate the TRM framework. The framework helps identify the factors, and specifically the rate at which we must support technology development, necessary to meet our desired technical and policy goals in the coming decades.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 225
页数:15
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Smart-grid investments, regulation and organization [J].
Agrell, Per J. ;
Bogetoft, Peter ;
Mikkers, Misja .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :656-666
[2]  
Alic J.A., 2003, US Technology and innovation policies lessions for climate change
[3]   Innovation system foresight [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Andersen, Per Dannemand .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 88 :276-286
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1866, The coal question
[5]  
[Anonymous], SCEN GREENH GAS EM A
[6]   Public policy for energy technology innovation -: A historical analysis of fluidized bed combustion development in the USA [J].
Bañales-López, S ;
Norberg-Bohm, V .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (13) :1173-1180
[7]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[8]   Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: Exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings [J].
Bertoldi, Paolo ;
Rezessy, Silvia ;
Oikonomou, Vlasis .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 56 :526-535
[9]   Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy [J].
Blyth, William ;
Bradley, Richard ;
Bunn, Derek ;
Clarke, Charlie ;
Wilson, Tom ;
Yang, Ming .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (11) :5766-5773
[10]  
Brown M.A., 2008, Stanford Law and Policy Review, V19, P472