Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Two Licorice Root Species (Glycyrrhiza glabra L. and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) by HPTLC, Validated by HPLC and DNA Sequencing

被引:7
作者
Frommenwiler, Debora Arruda [1 ]
Maire-Widmer, Valeria [1 ]
Upton, Roy [2 ]
Nichols, Judith [3 ]
Heubl, Guenther [4 ,5 ]
Reich, Eike [1 ]
机构
[1] CAMAG Lab, Sonnenmattstr 11, CH-4132 Muttenz, Switzerland
[2] Amer Herbal Pharmacopoeia, PO 66809, Scotts Valley, CA USA
[3] CAMAG Sci Inc, 515 Cornelius Harnett Dr, Wilmington, NC 28401 USA
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munich LMU, Dept Biol 1, Systemat Bot & Mycol, Munich, Germany
[5] GeoBioctr LMU, Munich, Germany
关键词
High-performance thin-layer chromatography; Licorice; Glycyrrhiza glabra L; Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch ex DC; Quantification; IDENTIFICATION; BOTANICALS;
D O I
10.1556/1006.2017.30.6.2
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The herbal drug licorice root may be derived from the plant species Glycyrrhiza glabra L., Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, and/or Glycyrrhiza inflata Bat. which are morphologically, chemically, pharmacologically, and toxicologically similar. However, if an ingredient of a dietary supplement is identified as a certain species and labeled as such on the product, appropriate analytical methodologies are required to assure the authenticity. Using high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), we were able to distinguish clearly between G. glabra and G. uralensis, the most commonly used species, which allowed us to check the corresponding label claims of twenty-six dietary supplements. Two samples of G. inflata Bat., which were available for the study, were not distinguished from G. glabra by this method. Our investigation revealed that five of the twenty-eight samples made a wrong label claim. The HPTLC results were confirmed by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcoding. For the quantitative analysis of the marker 18 beta-glycyrrhizic acid in licorice root, we modified our HPTLC method for base-line separation of the peaks which guaranteed accurate results. Moreover, the new method is also capable to identify and distinguish both species of licorice. The quantitative HPTLC results were in accordance with the data obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) method on licorice root. In addition, we used two DNA candidate barcodes (internal transcribed spacer [ITS] and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer) for species identification.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 473
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MON GLYC RAD RHIZ, V1, P214
[2]   A SET OF UNIVERSAL PRIMERS FOR AMPLIFICATION OF POLYMORPHIC NONCODING REGIONS OF MITOCHONDRIAL AND CHLOROPLAST DNA IN PLANTS [J].
DEMESURE, B ;
SODZI, N ;
PETIT, RJ .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1995, 4 (01) :129-131
[3]  
European Pharmacopoeia, 2015, EUR PHARM MON, V277
[4]  
Fabricant D., 2015, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
[5]   Species identification of licorice using nrDNA and cpDNA genetic markers [J].
Kondo, Kenji ;
Shiba, Mao ;
Yamaji, Hiroki ;
Morota, Takashi ;
Zhengmin, Cheng ;
Huixia, Pan ;
Shoyama, Yukhiro .
BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 30 (08) :1497-1502
[6]  
Long J., 2016, NATURAL PRODUCTS INS
[7]   Molecular phylogeny of Nepenthaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid trnK intron sequence data [J].
Meimberg, H ;
Wistuba, A ;
Dittrich, P ;
Heubl, G .
PLANT BIOLOGY, 2001, 3 (02) :164-175
[8]   A standardized approach to modern high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) [J].
Reich, E ;
Schibli, A .
JPC-JOURNAL OF PLANAR CHROMATOGRAPHY-MODERN TLC, 2004, 17 (06) :438-443
[9]  
Reich E, 2008, J AOAC INT, V91, P13
[10]   Metabolite Profiling and Classification of DNA-Authenticated Licorice Botanicals [J].
Simmler, Charlotte ;
Anderson, Jeffrey R. ;
Gauthier, Laura ;
Lankin, David C. ;
McAlpine, James B. ;
Chen, Shao-Nong ;
Pauli, Guido F. .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS, 2015, 78 (08) :2007-2022