Factors associated with the prescribing of high-dose opioids in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Richards, Georgia C. [1 ,2 ]
Mahtani, Kamal R. [1 ,2 ]
Muthee, Tonny B. [1 ,2 ]
DeVito, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koshiaris, Constantinos [2 ]
Aronson, Jeffrey K. [1 ]
Goldacre, Ben [2 ,3 ]
Heneghan, Carl J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, EBMDatalab, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
关键词
Opioids; High dose; Primary care; Systematic review; Benzodiazepines; Depression; Emergency department; CHRONIC PAIN; MIXED-METHODS; RISK; GUIDELINES; ANALGESICS; DEPRESSION; MANAGEMENT; ADHERENCE; OVERDOSE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-020-01528-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The risks of harms from opioids increase substantially at high doses, and high-dose prescribing has increased in primary care. However, little is known about what leads to high-dose prescribing, and studies exploring this have not been synthesized. We, therefore, systematically synthesized factors associated with the prescribing of high-dose opioids in primary care. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies in high-income countries that used patient-level primary care data and explored any factor(s) in people for whom opioids were prescribed, stratified by oral morphine equivalents (OME). We defined high doses as >= 90 OME mg/day. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, reference lists, forward citations, and conference proceedings from database inception to 5 April 2019. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised the quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. We pooled data on factors using random effects meta-analyses and reported relative risks (RR) or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) where appropriate. We also performed a number needed to harm (NNTH) calculation on factors when applicable. Results: We included six studies with a total of 4,248,119 participants taking opioids, of whom 3.64% (n = 154,749) were taking high doses. The majority of included studies (n = 4) were conducted in the USA, one in Australia and one in the UK. The largest study (n = 4,046,275) was from the USA. Included studies were graded as having fair to good quality evidence. The co-prescription of benzodiazepines (RR 3.27, 95% CI 1.32 to 8.13, I-2 = 99.9%), depression (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.51, I-2 = 0%), emergency department visits (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.61, I-2 = 0%, NNTH 15, 95% CI 12 to 20), unemployment (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.63, I-2 = 0%), and male gender (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.28, I-2 = 78.6%) were significantly associated with the prescribing of high-dose opioids in primary care. Conclusions: High doses of opioids are associated with greater risks of harms. Associated factors such as the co-prescription of benzodiazepines and depression identify priority areas that should be considered when selecting, identifying, and managing people taking high-dose opioids in primary care. Coordinated strategies and services that promote the safe prescribing of opioids are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors associated with the prescribing of high-dose opioids in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Georgia C. Richards
    Kamal R. Mahtani
    Tonny B. Muthee
    Nicholas J. DeVito
    Constantinos Koshiaris
    Jeffrey K. Aronson
    Ben Goldacre
    Carl J. Heneghan
    BMC Medicine, 18
  • [2] Uptake of patient enrolment in primary care and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jialing Lin
    Shona Bates
    Luke N. Allen
    Michael Wright
    Limin Mao
    Rafal Chomik
    Chris Dietz
    Michael Kidd
    BMC Primary Care, 26 (1):
  • [3] Effect of psychiatric consultation models in primary care. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
    Van Os, Titus W. D. P.
    Van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
    Leentjens, Albert F. G.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (06) : 521 - 533
  • [4] Audit and Feedback Interventions for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xu, Alice X. T.
    Brown, Kevin
    Schwartz, Kevin L.
    Aghlmandi, Soheila
    Alderson, Sarah
    Brehaut, Jamie C.
    Brown, Benjamin C.
    Bucher, Heiner C.
    Clarkson, Janet
    De Sutter, An
    Francis, Nick A.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Gunnarsson, Ronny
    Hallsworth, Michael
    Hemkens, Lars
    Hoye, Sigurd
    Khan, Tasneem
    Lecky, Donna M.
    Leung, Felicia
    Leung, Jeremy
    Lindbaek, Morten
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    Llor, Carl
    Little, Paul
    O'Connor, Denise
    Pulcini, Celine
    Ramlackhan, Kalisha
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Sundvall, Par-Daniel
    Taljaard, Monica
    Lundgren, Pia Touboul
    Vellinga, Akke
    Verbakel, Jan Y.
    Verheij, Theo J.
    Wikberg, Carl
    Ivers, Noah
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2025, 80 (02) : 253 - 262
  • [5] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of standard- and high-dose daptomycin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Samura, Masaru
    Takada, Keisuke
    Hirose, Naoki
    Kurata, Takenori
    Nagumo, Fumio
    Uchida, Masaki
    Inoue, Junki
    Tanikawa, Koji
    Enoki, Yuki
    Taguchi, Kazuaki
    Matsumoto, Kazuaki
    Ueda, Takashi
    Fujimura, Shigeru
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    Takesue, Yoshio
    Mitsutake, Kotaro
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 89 (04) : 1291 - 1303
  • [6] Prevalence of Therapeutic use of Opioids in Chronic non-Cancer Pain Patients and Associated Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    De Sola, Helena
    Duenas, Maria
    Salazar, Alejandro
    Ortega-Jimenez, Patricia
    Failde, Inmaculada
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [7] Collaborative care for patients with depression and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Yafang
    Wei, Xiaoming
    Wu, Tao
    Chen, Rui
    Guo, Aimin
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 13
  • [8] Opioids and Their Endocrine Effects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    de Vries, Friso
    Bruin, Mees
    Lobatto, Daniel J.
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Schoones, Jan W.
    van Furth, Wouter R.
    Pereira, Alberto M.
    Karavitaki, Niki
    Biermasz, Nienke R.
    Najafabadi, Amir H. Zamanipoor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (04) : 1020 - 1029
  • [9] Cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Santoft, Fredrik
    Axelsson, Erland
    Ost, Lars-Goran
    Hedman-Lagerlof, Maria
    Fust, Jens
    Hedman-Lagerlof, Erik
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 49 (08) : 1266 - 1274
  • [10] Effectiveness of interventions to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laliberte, M. -C.
    Perreault, S.
    Jouini, G.
    Shea, B. J.
    Lalonde, L.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (11) : 2743 - 2768