MouseView.js']js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture

被引:19
作者
Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L. [1 ]
Armstrong, Thomas [2 ]
Dalmaijer, Edwin S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Whitman Coll, Dept Psychol, Walla Walla, WA 99362 USA
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Attention; eye tracking; online experiments; !text type='Java']Java[!/text]Script; open-source; cyberpsychology; EYE TRACKING; VISUAL-ATTENTION; FIXATION; LIBRARY; LOOKING; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-021-01703-5
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Psychological research is increasingly moving online, where web-based studies allow for data collection at scale. Behavioural researchers are well supported by existing tools for participant recruitment, and for building and running experiments with decent timing. However, not all techniques are portable to the Internet: While eye tracking works in tightly controlled lab conditions, webcam-based eye tracking suffers from high attrition and poorer quality due to basic limitations like webcam availability, poor image quality, and reflections on glasses and the cornea. Here we present MouseView.js, an alternative to eye tracking that can be employed in web-based research. Inspired by the visual system, MouseView.js blurs the display to mimic peripheral vision, but allows participants to move a sharp aperture that is roughly the size of the fovea. Like eye gaze, the aperture can be directed to fixate on stimuli of interest. We validated MouseView.js in an online replication (N = 165) of an established free viewing task (N = 83 existing eye-tracking datasets), and in an in-lab direct comparison with eye tracking in the same participants (N = 50). Mouseview.js proved as reliable as gaze, and produced the same pattern of dwell time results. In addition, dwell time differences from MouseView.js and from eye tracking correlated highly, and related to self-report measures in similar ways. The tool is open-source, implemented in JavaScript, and usable as a standalone library, or within Gorilla, jsPsych, and PsychoJS. In sum, MouseView.js is a freely available instrument for attention-tracking that is both reliable and valid, and that can replace eye tracking in certain web-based psychological experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:1663 / 1687
页数:25
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Dopamine Modulates Option Generation for Behavior
    Ang, Yuen-Siang
    Manohar, Sanjay
    Plant, Olivia
    Kienast, Annika
    Le Heron, Campbell
    Muhammed, Kinan
    Hu, Michele
    Husain, Masud
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (10) : 1561 - +
  • [2] Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices
    Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander
    Dalmaijer, Edwin S.
    Hodges, Nick
    Evershed, Jo K.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2021, 53 (04) : 1407 - 1425
  • [3] Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder
    Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L.
    Massonnie, Jessica
    Flitton, Adam
    Kirkham, Natasha
    Evershed, Jo K.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (01) : 388 - 407
  • [4] I've Seen Enough! Prolonged and Repeated Exposure to Disgusting Stimuli Increases Oculomotor Avoidance
    Armstrong, Thomas
    Stewart, Jeremy G.
    Dalmaijer, Edwin S.
    Rowe, Megan
    Danielson, Siri
    Engel, Mira
    Bailey, Brooklynn
    Morris, Matthew
    [J]. EMOTION, 2022, 22 (06) : 1368 - 1381
  • [5] Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis
    Armstrong, Thomas
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (08) : 704 - 723
  • [6] Decreased Fixation Stability of the Preferred Retinal Location in Juvenile Macular Degeneration
    Bethlehem, Richard A. I.
    Dumoulin, Serge O.
    Dalmaijer, Edwin S.
    Smit, Miranda
    Berendschot, Tos T. J. M.
    Nijboer, Tanja C. W.
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [7] Blackwell AF, 2000, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V1889, P162
  • [8] Selective looking at natural scenes: Hedonic content and gender
    Bradley, Margaret M.
    Costa, Vincent D.
    Lang, Peter J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 98 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [9] The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online
    Bridges, David
    Pitiot, Alain
    MacAskill, Michael R.
    Peirce, Jonathan W.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [10] ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences
    Cristino, Filipe
    Mathot, Sebastiaan
    Theeuwes, Jan
    Gilchrist, Iain D.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 42 (03) : 692 - 700