Personal exposure to ultrafine particles

被引:181
作者
Wallace, Lance [1 ]
Ott, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
cooking; restaurants; gas stoves; electric stoves; vehicles; tobacco smoke; AIR CHANGE RATES; INDOOR SOURCES; POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; GAS; FINE; EMISSION; OUTDOOR; NUMBER; MASS;
D O I
10.1038/jes.2009.59
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Personal exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP) can occur while people are cooking, driving, smoking, operating small appliances such as hair dryers, or eating out in restaurants. These exposures can often be higher than outdoor concentrations. For 3 years, portable monitors were employed in homes, cars, and restaurants. More than 300 measurement periods in several homes were documented, along with 25 h of driving two cars, and 22 visits to restaurants. Cooking on gas or electric stoves and electric toaster ovens was a major source of UFP, with peak personal exposures often exceeding 100,000 particles/cm(3) and estimated emission rates in the neighborhood of 10(12) particles/min. Other common sources of high UFP exposures were cigarettes, a vented gas clothes dryer, an air popcorn popper, candles, an electric mixer, a toaster, a hair dryer, a curling iron, and a steam iron. Relatively low indoor UFP emissions were noted for a fireplace, several space heaters, and a laser printer. Driving resulted in moderate exposures averaging about 30,000 particles/cm(3) in each of two cars driven on 17 trips on major highways on the East and West Coasts. Most of the restaurants visited maintained consistently high levels of 50,000-200,000 particles/cm(3) for the entire length of the meal. The indoor/outdoor ratios of size-resolved UFP were much lower than for PM2.5 or PM10, suggesting that outdoor UFP have difficulty in penetrating a home. This in turn implies that outdoor concentrations of UFP have only a moderate effect on personal exposures if indoor sources are present. A time-weighted scenario suggests that for typical suburban nonsmoker lifestyles, indoor sources provide about 47% and outdoor sources about 36% of total daily UFP exposure and in-vehicle exposures add the remainder (17%). However, the effect of one smoker in the home results in an overwhelming increase in the importance of indoor sources (77% of the total). Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 20-30; doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.59; published online 20 January 2010
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations
    Abt, E
    Suh, HH
    Catalano, P
    Koutrakis, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (17) : 3579 - 3587
  • [2] Characterization of indoor sources of fine and ultrafine particles: a study conducted in a full-scale chamber
    Afshari, A
    Matson, U
    Ekberg, LE
    [J]. INDOOR AIR, 2005, 15 (02) : 141 - 150
  • [3] Indoor particles affect vascular function in the aged -: An air filtration-based intervention study
    Brauner, Elvira Vaclavik
    Forchhammer, Lykke
    Moller, Peter
    Barregard, Lars
    Gunnarsen, Lars
    Afshari, Alireza
    Wahlin, Peter
    Glasius, Marianne
    Dragsted, Lars Ove
    Basu, Samar
    Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
    Loft, Steffen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 177 (04) : 419 - 425
  • [4] Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage
    Brauner, Elvira Vaclavik
    Forchhammer, Lykke
    Moller, Peter
    Simonsen, Jacob
    Glasius, Marianne
    Wahlin, Peter
    Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
    Loft, Steffen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (08) : 1177 - 1182
  • [5] Ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking
    Dennekamp, M
    Howarth, S
    Dick, CAJ
    Cherrie, JW
    Donaldson, K
    Seaton, A
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (08) : 511 - 516
  • [6] Measurements and predictors of on-road ultrafine particle concentrations and associated pollutants in Los Angeles
    Fruin, S.
    Westerdahl, D.
    Sax, T.
    Sioutas, C.
    Fine, P. M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [7] The particle detection efficiency of the TSI-3007 condensation particle counter
    Hämeri, K
    Koponen, IK
    Aalto, PP
    Kulmala, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (10) : 1463 - 1469
  • [8] Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses
    He, CR
    Morawska, LD
    Hitchins, J
    Gilbert, D
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (21) : 3405 - 3415
  • [9] Indoor-outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities
    Hoek, Gerard
    Kos, Gerard
    Harrison, Roy M.
    de Hartog, Jeroen
    Meliefste, Kees
    ten Brink, Harry
    Katsouyanni, Klea
    Karakatsani, Anna
    Lianou, Maria
    Kotronarou, Anastasia
    Kavouras, Ilias
    Pekkanen, Juha
    Vallius, Marko
    Kulmala, Markku
    Puustinen, Arto
    Thomas, Steve
    Meddings, Claire
    Ayres, Jon
    van Wijnen, Joop
    Hameri, Kaarle
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (01) : 156 - 169
  • [10] The effect of opening windows on air change rates in two homes
    Howard-Reed, C
    Wallace, LA
    Ott, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (02): : 147 - 159