Attentional bias for vegetables is negatively associated with acceptability and is related to sensory properties

被引:10
|
作者
Agovi, Herdis [1 ]
Pierguidi, Lapo [1 ]
Dinnella, Caterina [1 ]
Viggiano, Maria Pia [2 ]
Monteleone, Erminio [1 ]
Spinelli, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEURO, Florence, Italy
关键词
Attention; Emotions; Sensory; Vegetables; Implicit methods; PROP TASTER STATUS; FOOD NEOPHOBIA; QUANTITATIVE MEASURE; AUTOMATIC VIGILANCE; VISUAL-ATTENTION; GRABBING POWER; STROOP TEST; LOWER RISK; CHOICE; LIKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104429
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Understanding why many individuals dislike vegetables is relevant to develop effective strategies to change food behaviors promoting healthier choices. The influences of sensory properties in the development of food preferences are well known. Attention as well may play a role in this process. Indeed, attention enhances information processing of emotionally salient objects or events by selecting them from the environmental context in which they are embedded. This study was aimed at investigating the relationship between acceptability of vegetables, food neophobia and taste responsiveness (measured as responsiveness to 6-n- propylthiouracil-PROP) and the attentive responses to vegetables that differ in sensory properties. 120 adults (20-24 years old, 74.2% women) were recruited and characterized for Food Neophobia and PROP responsiveness. To assess the interferences between emotional and attentional processes a food version of the Emotional Stroop Task was used. Attentional bias was measured through reaction times (RTs) to word stimuli, which included 16 vegetables characterized by generally appealing (e.g. 'sweetness', 'mildness') or unappealing (e.g. 'bitterness', 'astringency') sensory properties, and 16 emotionally neutral objects presented as control. A clear association between vegetable liking scores and sensory properties was found in this study, confirming the categorization of appealing and unappealing vegetables. Furthermore, results showed significantly higher RTs for vegetables than for neutral objects, demonstrating that vegetables were more emotionally salient than objects. Furthermore, the interference scores, computed as the differences between average RTs to unappealing/appealing vegetable words and average RTs to neutral words, for vegetables with unappealing sensory properties were higher than those for vegetables characterized by appealing sensory properties, indicating a greater attentional bias for unappealing vegetables. A strong inverse correlation between liking scores and RTs (r = -0.83) was found. No effect of food neophobia and PROP status was found on interferences scores, while PROP supertasters showed higher RTs for vegetables in general. The study showed that attention is particularly grabbed by vegetables with unappealing sensory properties, thus indicating that attention play a role in vegetable acceptability.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reward sensitivity predicts ice cream-related attentional bias assessed by inattentional blindness
    Li, Xiaoming
    Tao, Qian
    Fang, Ya
    Cheng, Chen
    Hao, Yangyang
    Qi, Jianjun
    Li, Yu
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Xiaochu
    APPETITE, 2015, 89 : 258 - 264
  • [32] The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers
    Miller, Melissa A.
    Fillmore, Mark T.
    ADDICTION, 2010, 105 (05) : 883 - 890
  • [33] Eye Tracking Reveals Impaired Attentional Disengagement Associated with Sensory Response Patterns in Children with Autism
    Maura Sabatos-DeVito
    Sarah E. Schipul
    John C. Bulluck
    Aysenil Belger
    Grace T. Baranek
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016, 46 : 1319 - 1333
  • [34] Association between attentional bias to experimentally induced pain and to pain-related words in healthy individuals: the moderating role of interpretation bias
    Broadbent, Philippa
    Schoth, Daniel E.
    Liossi, Christina
    PAIN, 2022, 163 (02) : 319 - 333
  • [35] Do people with acute low back pain have an attentional bias to threat-related words?
    Skinner, Ian
    Hubscher, Markus
    Lee, Hopin
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    McAuley, James H.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 21 (03) : 485 - 494
  • [36] Individuals' attentional bias toward an envied target's name: An event-related potential study
    Zhong, Jun
    Liu, Yongfang
    Zhang, Entao
    Luo, Junlong
    Chen, Jie
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 550 : 109 - 114
  • [37] The effect of alcohol on food-related attentional bias, food reward and intake: Two experimental studies
    Gough, Thomas
    Christiansen, Paul
    Rose, Abigail K.
    Hardman, Charlotte A.
    APPETITE, 2021, 162
  • [38] Scalp-recorded N40 visual evoked potential: Sensory and attentional properties
    Proverbio, Alice Mado
    Broido, Veronica
    De Benedetto, Francesco
    Zani, Alberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 54 (07) : 6553 - 6574
  • [39] The functional activity and effective connectivity of pulvinar are modulated by individual differences in threat-related attentional bias
    Hakamata, Yuko
    Sato, Eisuke
    Komi, Shotaro
    Moriguchi, Yoshiya
    Izawa, Shuhei
    Murayama, Norio
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Inoue, Yusuke
    Tagaya, Hirokuni
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [40] Sensory-motor properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task
    Brouillet, Denis
    Vagnot, Caroline
    Milhau, Audrey
    Brunel, Lionel
    Briglia, Johan
    Versace, Remy
    Rousset, Stephane
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2015, 79 (04): : 678 - 686