Targets missed: predictors of MRI-targeted biopsy failing to accurately localize prostate cancer found on systematic biopsy

被引:21
|
作者
Coker, Michael Austin [1 ]
Glaser, Zachary A. [1 ]
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, John, V [3 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; FUSION BIOPSY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-018-0062-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy has improved the ability to localize and detect prostate cancer (PCa) with efficiency surpassing systematic biopsy. Nevertheless, some patients have PCa missed using the MRI-targeted biopsy sampling alone. We aim to identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with cases where targeted biopsy did not detect PCa compared to systematic biopsy. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in addition to concurrent systematic, extended-sextant biopsy between 2014 and 2017. For patients with PCa detected on systematic biopsy not properly localized by MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy, the sextant distance from MRI-targeted lesion to the cancer-positive sextant was calculated and parameters potentially predicting this targeting miss were evaluated. Results In all, 35/127 (27.6%) patients with single-session MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy plus standard biopsy finding PCa had lesions incorrectly localized. Of these, 15/35 (42.9%) were identified as possible fusion-software misregistrations. The remainder, 12/35 (34.3%), represented targeted biopsies one sextant away from the cancer focus and 8/35 (22.9%) targeted biopsies two sextants away from the cancer focus. Only 7/35 (20.0%) patients were determined to have clinically significant PCa, which represents 7/127 (5.5%) of the overall population. Lower MRI lesion volumes (p = 0.022), lesion density (p < 0.001), and PIRADS scores (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with targeted biopsy missing PCa detected on systematic biopsy. Conclusion Clinically significant PCa is rarely missed utilizing MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy. With the majority of missed tumors representing targeting misregistrations or cases of low-grade cancer in sextants immediately adjacent to MRI suspicious lesions. Lower MRI lesion volumes, lesion density, and PI-RADS are predictors of cases with targeted biopsies missing cancer, for which systematic sampling of the sextants containing MRI targets and adjacent sextants would most optimize PCa detection.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04):
  • [2] MRI-targeted biopsy: is systematic biopsy obsolete?
    Sugano, Dordaneh
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Calio, Brian
    Cobb, Kaitlan
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 8876 - 8882
  • [3] MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Wilbur, Andrew R.
    Reese, Sarah E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Pinsky, Paul
    Parnes, Howard
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10): : 917 - 928
  • [4] MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
    Kasivisvanathan, V
    Rannikko, A. S.
    Borghi, M.
    Panebianco, V
    Mynderse, L. A.
    Vaarala, M. H.
    Briganti, A.
    Budaus, L.
    Hellawell, G.
    Hindley, R. G.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Eggener, S.
    Ghei, M.
    Villers, A.
    Bladou, F.
    Villeirs, G. M.
    Virdi, J.
    Boxler, S.
    Robert, G.
    Singh, P. B.
    Venderink, W.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Ruffion, A.
    Hu, J. C.
    Margolis, D.
    Crouzet, S.
    Klotz, L.
    Taneja, S. S.
    Pinto, P.
    Gill, I
    Allen, C.
    Giganti, F.
    Freeman, A.
    Morris, S.
    Punwani, S.
    Williams, N. R.
    Brew-Graves, C.
    Deeks, J.
    Takwoingi, Y.
    Emberton, M.
    Moore, C. M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19): : 1767 - 1777
  • [5] Developments in MRI-targeted prostate biopsy
    Norris, Joseph M.
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Walz, Jochen
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [6] Optimizing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the diagnostic benefit of additional targeted biopsy cores
    Tracy, Chad R.
    Flynn, Kevin J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Gellhaus, Paul T.
    Metz, Catherine M.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (03) : 193.e1 - 193.e6
  • [7] Prediagnostic Risk Assessment with Prostate MRI and MRI-Targeted Biopsy
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 44 (04) : 535 - +
  • [8] A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate
    Giganti, Francesco
    Moore, Caroline M.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 432 - 443
  • [9] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Ming
    Zhu, Gang
    Roobol, Monique J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [10] Comparing confirmatory biopsy outcomes between MRI-targeted biopsy and standard systematic biopsy among men being enrolled in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Shapiro, Daniel D.
    Gregg, Justin R.
    Lim, Amy H.
    Nogueras-Gonzalez, Graciela M.
    Choi, Haesun
    Kang, Hyunseon C.
    Inguillo, Irene A.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Davis, John W.
    Ward, John F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (03) : 340 - 348