Selection of waste-to-energy technology for distributed generation using IDOCRIW-Weighted TOPSIS method: A case study of the City of Johannesburg, South Africa

被引:61
作者
Alao, Moshood Akanni [1 ,2 ]
Popoola, Olawale M. [1 ,2 ]
Ayodele, Temitope Rapheal [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Technol, Ctr Energy & Elect Power, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Ibadan, Fac Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Power Energy Machines & Drives Res Grp, Ibadan, Nigeria
关键词
Waste-to-Energy; Entropy; Criteria impact loss; Anaerobic digestion; Gasification; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; MECHANICAL DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; OPTIONS; GAS; NORMALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste-to-energy has evolved as a promising solution for sustainable power generation as well and waste management. To effectively harness the potential of the waste-to-energy technologies in a sustainable manner, an optimal choice among the diverse technologies is highly essential. The multi-dimensional nature of waste management makes selection of appropriate waste-to-energy option a complex problem. Therefore, a simple and computationally efficient decision tool is required to aid decision making. In this paper, a novel hybrid multi-criteria method based on IDOCRIW and TOPSIS are proposed for optimal selection of the appropriate waste-to-energy technologies for distributed generation. Fourteen criteria were considered spanning through technical, economic, environmental and social factors. Five technologies such as anaerobic digestion, landfill gas recovery, incineration, pyrolysis and gasification were selected due to their level of maturity and availability. The proposed model was tested using the City of Johannesburg, South Africa as a case study. The overall results indicated that anaerobic digestion is the most attractive technology with a relative closeness of 0.9724 to the ideal solution while incineration is ranked worst with a closeness of 0.6474 to the ideal solution. The result also revealed that the integration of anaerobic digestion and gasification could be more promising in terms of waste management. It could also be a good candidate for distributed generation in a microgrid application by serving as a local power generator when integrated to waste management systems of the City of Johannesburg. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 183
页数:22
相关论文
共 94 条
[81]  
Vafaei Nazanin, 2018, International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, V10, P19
[82]   Is phytoremediation without biomass valorization sustainable? - Comparative LCA of landfilling vs. anaerobic co-digestion [J].
Vigil, Miguel ;
Marey-Perez, Manuel F. ;
Martinez Huerta, Gemma ;
Cabal, Valeriano Alvarez .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 505 :844-850
[83]   Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods as a Part of Mathematical Optimization [J].
Vinogradova, Irina .
MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (10)
[84]   Weighting methodologies in multi-criteria evaluations of combined heat and power systems [J].
Wang, Jiang-Jiang ;
Jing, You-Yin ;
Zhang, Chun-Fa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (12) :1023-1039
[85]   Waste-to-energy, municipal solid waste treatment, and best available technology: Comprehensive evaluation by an interval-valued fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method [J].
Wang, Zhenfeng ;
Ren, Jingzheng ;
Goodsite, Michael Evan ;
Xu, Guangyin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 :887-899
[86]  
Willusen H, 2009, GUIDANCE NOTE LANDFI
[87]   A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK [J].
Yap, H. Y. ;
Nixon, J. D. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 46 :265-277
[88]   SWARA/WASPAS methods for a marine current energy plant location selection problem [J].
Yucenur, G. Nilay ;
Ipekci, Ahmet .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 163 :1287-1298
[89]   Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations [J].
Yue, Chuan .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 :737-749
[90]   Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method [J].
Zaman, A. U. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 7 (02) :225-234