Oral complications after lingual mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty

被引:26
作者
Kumar, Abhay [1 ]
Goyal, Neeraj K. [1 ]
Das, Suren K. [1 ]
Trivedi, Sameer [1 ]
Dwivedi, Udai S. [1 ]
Singh, Pratap B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
buccal mucosal graft; lingual mucosal graft harvesting; oral complication; substitution urethroplasty; urethroplasty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04292.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the complications at donor site after lingual mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Methods: From March 2006 to December 2006, 30 patients of anterior urethral stricture underwent lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty. The site of the harvest graft was lateral mucosal lining of the tongue. Donor site complications, that is, pain, slurring of speech, pain during speech, salivatory changes and difficulty in protrusion of tongue were noted. Results: The mean (range) age of patients was 36.2 years (22-52 years). The mean (range) stricture length was 8.4 cm (4.8-16 cm) and graft length was 8.5 cm (4.2-16.2 cm). Mean duration of follow up was 3.8 months. At the first postoperative day, 90% of the patients experienced pain at donor site and 20% had slurring of speech. Pain was mild to discomforting in 80% and distressing to horrible in 13% of the patients. By third postoperative day, two-thirds were pain free, one-thirds had mild pain only and none had slurring of speech. By day 6 of surgery, all patients were pain free. Six per cent of the patients reported numbness over ventral aspect of anterior half of tongue, which persisted in the first follow up and subsided by second follow up. There was no bleeding, haematoma or infection at donor site. All patients were able to resume oral fluid within 24 h, eat soft solid diet in 48-72 h and return to normal diet after 4-5 days of surgery. No patient complained of difficulty in opening the mouth, salivation disturbances, perioral numbness or difficulty in protrusion of tongue. No long-term functional or aesthetic complications were reported. Conclusion: Lingual mucosal graft harvesting is feasible, provides a long graft, is easy to carry out and is the least morbid procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 973
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Dorsal free graft urethroplasty [J].
Barbagli, G ;
Selli, C ;
Tosto, A ;
Palminteri, E .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) :123-126
[2]   THE BUCCAL MUCOSAL GRAFT FOR URETHRAL RECONSTRUCTION - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
BURGER, RA ;
MULLER, SC ;
ELDAMANHOURY, H ;
TSCHAKALOFF, A ;
RIEDMILLER, H ;
HOHENFELLNER, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :662-664
[3]  
COHEN SR, 1991, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V88, P615
[4]   Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty [J].
Dublin, N ;
Stewart, LH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (06) :867-869
[5]  
ELKASABY AW, 1993, J UROLOGY, V149, P276, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36054-8
[6]   A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction [J].
Eppley, BL ;
Keating, M ;
Rink, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (04) :1268-1270
[7]   FREE TONGUE COMPOSITE GRAFT FOR CORRECTION OF A VERMILION DEFECT [J].
GUERREROSANTOS, J ;
DICKSHEET, S ;
RUIZRAZURA, A .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1985, 76 (03) :451-454
[8]   Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty:: lower lip or inner cheek? [J].
Kamp, S ;
Knoll, T ;
Osman, M ;
Häcker, A ;
Michel, MS ;
Alken, P .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (04) :619-623
[9]   MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE - MAJOR PROPERTIES AND SCORING METHODS [J].
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1975, 1 (03) :277-299
[10]   Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction [J].
Morey, AF ;
McAninch, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (05) :1696-1697