Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development?

被引:103
作者
Branstetter, Lee [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Fisman, Ray [3 ,6 ]
Foley, C. Fritz [4 ,6 ]
Saggi, Kamal [5 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz III Coll, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Columbia Business Sch, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, VU Stn B 351828, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[6] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Intellectual property rights; Multinational enterprises; Foreign direct investment; Industrial development; Production shifting; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PATENT PROTECTION; PRODUCT CYCLES; INNOVATION; SPILLOVERS; INCREASE; TRADE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An extensive theoretical literature generates ambiguous predictions concerning the effects of intellectual property rights (IPR) reform on industrial development. The impact depends on whether multinational enterprises (MNEs) expand production in reforming countries and the extent of decline in imitative activity. We examine the responses of U.S.-based MNEs and domestic industrial production to a set of intellectual property rights reforms in the 1980s and 1990s. Following reform, MNEs expand the scale of their activities. MNEs that make extensive use of intellectual property disproportionately increase their use of inputs. There is an overall expansion of industrial activity after reform, and highly disaggregated trade data indicate higher exports of new goods. These results suggest that the expansion of multinational activity more than offsets any decline in imitative activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 8498 NBER WP
  • [2] Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching
    Bernard, Andrew B.
    Redding, Stephen J.
    Schott, Peter K.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) : 70 - 97
  • [3] BRANSTETTER L, 2007, 13033 NBER WP
  • [4] Branstetter LG, 2006, Q J ECON, V121, P321
  • [5] Brune N., 2004, In Search of Credible Commitments: The IMF and Capital Account Liberalization in the Developing World
  • [6] Estimating the effects of global patent protection in pharmaceuticals: A case study of quinolones in India
    Chaudhuri, Shubham
    Goldberg, Pinelopi K.
    Jia, Panle
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (05) : 1477 - 1514
  • [7] R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States
    Cohen, WM
    Goto, A
    Nagata, A
    Nelson, RR
    Walsh, JR
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (8-9) : 1349 - 1367
  • [8] International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement
    Eaton, J
    Kortum, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 40 (03) : 537 - 570
  • [9] Trade in ideas - Patenting and productivity in the OECD
    Eaton, J
    Kortum, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 40 (3-4) : 251 - 278
  • [10] FEENSTRA R, 2001, 9387 NBER WP