Wireless pH monitoring: Better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits

被引:22
作者
Grigolon, A. [1 ]
Bravi, I. [1 ]
Cantu, P. [1 ]
Conte, D. [1 ]
Penagini, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Med Sci, Chair Gastroenterol, I-20122 Milan, Italy
关键词
daily; food; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; wireless pH monitoring;
D O I
10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.011
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Twenty-four hours oesophageal pH monitoring is considered the reference-standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it is limited by catheter discomfort and limitations of daily habits. Aim. We evaluated tolerability and impact on food intake and daily activities of catheter-based compared to wireless pH monitoring. Patients. One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. Methods. Seventy-eight patients (36 M, 53 +/- 2 years) underwent the 24 h catheter-based and 55 patients (25 M, 44 +/- 3 years) the 48 h wireless pH monitoring. Discomfort at placement and during the test was evaluated by 100 mm visual analogue scales. Limitations of food intake and of daily activities were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (score 0 to 3). Results. Discomfort (mean +/- standard error of the mean) at placement and during the test was 32 +/- 3 versus 29 +/- 4 (p = ns) and 37 +/- 3 versus 22 +/- 13 (p < 0.001) for the catheter-based versus wireless techniques. Limitation of food intake and of daily activities (mean +/- standard error of the mean) were 0.9 +/- 0.1 versus 0.4 +/- 0.1 (p < 0.05) and 1.2 +/- 0.1 versus 0.2 +/- 0.1 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions. The wireless pH monitoring is better tolerated and has minor impact on daily habits compared to the traditional technique. Whether this translates into better diagnostic accuracy remains to be evaluated. (C) 2007 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 724
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system [J].
Ahlawat, SK ;
Novak, DJ ;
Williams, DC ;
Maher, KA ;
Barton, F ;
Benjamin, SB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 40 (01) :20-24
[2]   Wireless pH testing as an adjunct to unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy: The safety and efficacy of transnasal telemetry capsule placement [J].
Belafsky, PC ;
Allen, K ;
Rosario, LCD ;
Roseman, D .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2004, 131 (01) :26-28
[3]   Wireless esophageal pH monitoring - New technique means new questions [J].
Bhat, YM ;
McGrath, KM ;
Bielefeldt, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 40 (02) :116-121
[4]   Effect of calories and fat on postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux [J].
Colombo, P ;
Mangano, M ;
Bianchi, PA ;
Penagini, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 37 (01) :3-5
[5]   Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo) [J].
des Varannes, SB ;
Mion, F ;
Ducrotté, P ;
Zerbib, F ;
Denis, P ;
Ponchon, T ;
Thibault, R ;
Galmiche, JP .
GUT, 2005, 54 (12) :1682-1686
[6]   Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
DeVault, KR ;
Castell, DO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (01) :190-200
[7]   Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities [J].
Fass, R ;
Hell, R ;
Sampliner, RE ;
Pulliam, G ;
Graver, E ;
Hartz, V ;
Johnson, C ;
Jaffe, P .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1999, 44 (11) :2263-2269
[8]   Tolerance and reliability of wireless pH monitoring in children [J].
Hochman, JA ;
Favaloro-Sabatier, T .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2005, 41 (04) :411-415
[9]   Clinical esophageal pH recording: A technical review for practice guideline development [J].
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Quigley, EMM .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (06) :1982-1996
[10]  
KLAUSER AG, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P1463