Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project

被引:102
作者
Escher, Sylvia E. [1 ]
Kamp, Hennicke [2 ]
Bennekou, Susanne H. [3 ]
Bitsch, Annette [1 ]
Fisher, Ciaran [4 ]
Graepel, Rabea [5 ]
Hengstler, Jan G. [6 ]
Herzler, Matthias [7 ]
Knight, Derek [8 ]
Leist, Marcel [9 ]
Norinder, Ulf [10 ]
Ouedraogo, Gladys [11 ]
Pastor, Manuel [12 ]
Stuard, Sharon [13 ]
White, Andrew [14 ]
Zdrazil, Barbara [15 ]
van de Water, Bob [5 ]
Kroese, Dinant [16 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Toxicol & Expt Med ITEM, Hannover, Germany
[2] BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Natl Food Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Certare UK Ltd, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Leiden Univ, Leiden Acad Ctr Drug Res, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Leibniz Res Ctr IfADo, Dortmund, Germany
[7] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment BfR, Berlin, Germany
[8] European Chem Agcy, Hazard Directorate, Helsinki, Finland
[9] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany
[10] Stockholm Univ, Kista, Sweden
[11] Oreal Rech & Innovat, Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[12] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Inst Hosp del Mar Invest Med IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
[13] Procter & Gamble Co, Mason, OH USA
[14] Unilever PLC, Bedford, England
[15] Univ Vienna, Div Drug Design & Med Chem, Vienna, Austria
[16] TNO Innovat Life, Zeist, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAY; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTION; INHIBITION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Read-across is one of the most frequently used alternative tools for hazard assessment, in particular for complex endpoints such as repeated dose or developmental and reproductive toxicity. Read-across extrapolates the outcome of a specific toxicological in vivo endpoint from tested (source) compounds to "similar" (target) compound(s). If appropriately applied, a read-across approach can be used instead of de novo animal testing. The read-across approach starts with structural/physicochemical similarity between target and source compounds, assuming that similar structural characteristics lead to similar human hazards. In addition, similarity also has to be shown for the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties of the grouped compounds. To date, many read-across cases fail to demonstrate toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic similarities. New concepts, in vitro and in silico tools are needed to better characterise these properties, collectively called new approach methodologies (NAMs). This white paper outlines a general read-across assessment concept using NAMs to support hazard characterization of the grouped compounds by generating data on their dynamic and kinetic properties. Based on the overarching read-across hypothesis, the read-across workflow suggests targeted or untargeted NAM testing also outlining how mechanistic knowledge such as adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) can be utilized. Toxicokinetic models (biokinetic and PBPK), enriched by in vitro parameters such as plasma protein binding and hepatocellular clearance, are proposed to show (dis)similarity of target and source compound toxicokinetics. Furthermore, in vitro to in vivo extrapolation is proposed to predict a human equivalent dose, as potential point of departure for risk assessment. Finally, the generated NAM data are anchored to the existing in vivo data of source compounds to predict the hazard of the target compound in a qualitative and/or quantitative manner. To build this EU-ToxRisk read-across concept, case studies have been conducted and discussed with the regulatory community. These case studies are briefly outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:3643 / 3667
页数:25
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT ECOTOXICOLOGY RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
Ankley, Gerald T. ;
Bennett, Richard S. ;
Erickson, Russell J. ;
Hoff, Dale J. ;
Hornung, Michael W. ;
Johnson, Rodney D. ;
Mount, David R. ;
Nichols, John W. ;
Russom, Christine L. ;
Schmieder, Patricia K. ;
Serrrano, Jose A. ;
Tietge, Joseph E. ;
Villeneuve, Daniel L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (03) :730-741
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SCI DEC ADV RISK ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], MAN ASS CHEM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OECD Principles for the validation, for regulatory purposes, of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship models
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, COMPUTATIONAL APPROA
[6]  
Bal-Price A, 2018, OECD SERIES ADVERSE, V7, P184
[7]   Recommendation on Test Readiness Criteria for New Approach Methods in Toxicology: Exemplified for Developmental Neurotoxicity [J].
Bal-Price, Anna ;
Hogberg, Helena T. ;
Crofton, Kevin M. ;
Daneshian, Mardas ;
FitzGerald, Rex E. ;
Fritsche, Ellen ;
Heinonen, Tuula ;
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard ;
Klima, Stefanie ;
Piersma, Aldert H. ;
Sachana, Magdalini ;
Shafer, Timothy J. ;
Terron, Andrea ;
Monnet-Tschudi, Florianne ;
Viviani, Barbara ;
Waldmann, Tanja ;
Westerink, Remco H. S. ;
Wilks, Martin F. ;
Witters, Hilda ;
Zurich, Marie-Gabrielle ;
Leist, Marcel .
ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2018, 35 (03) :306-352
[8]   Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) Guidance [J].
Ball, Nicholas ;
Cronin, Mark T. D. ;
Shen, Jie ;
Blackburn, Karen ;
Booth, Ewan D. ;
Bouhifd, Mounir ;
Donley, Elizabeth ;
Egnash, Laura ;
Hastings, Charles ;
Juberg, Daland R. ;
Kleensang, Andre ;
Kleinstreuer, Nicole ;
Kroese, E. Dinant ;
Lee, Adam C. ;
Luechtefeld, Thomas ;
Maertens, Alexandra ;
Marty, Sue ;
Naciff, Jorge M. ;
Palmer, Jessica ;
Pamies, David ;
Penman, Mike ;
Richarz, Andrea-Nicole ;
Russo, Daniel P. ;
Stuard, Sharon B. ;
Patlewicz, Grace ;
van Ravenzwaay, Bennard ;
Wu, Shengde ;
Zhu, Hao ;
Hartung, Thomas .
ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2016, 33 (02) :149-166
[9]   A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty [J].
Blackburn, Karen ;
Stuard, Sharon B. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 68 (03) :353-362
[10]   Pharmacometric Models for Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drugs [J].
Borghardt, Jens Markus ;
Weber, Benjamin ;
Staab, Alexander ;
Kloft, Charlotte .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (04) :853-870