From sign-tracking to attentional bias: Implications for gambling and substance use disorders

被引:28
作者
Anselme, Patrick [1 ]
Robinson, Mike J. F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fac Psychol, Dept Biopsychol, Univ Str 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Psychol, 207 High St, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[3] Wesleyan Univ, Neurosci & Behav Program, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
关键词
Uncertainty; Addiction; Attentional bias; Sign-tracking; Gambling; ATTRIBUTE INCENTIVE SALIENCE; INCREASE PLASMA-CORTICOSTERONE; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS CORE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; GOAL-TRACKING; RATS PRONE; MOTIVATIONAL PROPERTIES; COGNITIVE BIASES; ALCOHOL CUES; COCAINE CUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109861
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Sign-tracking behavior in Pavlovian autoshaping is known to be a relevant index of the incentive salience attributed to reward-related cues. Evidence has accumulated to suggest that animals that exhibit a sign-tracker phenotype are especially vulnerable to addiction and relapse due to their proneness to attribute incentive salience to drug cues, and their relatively weak cognitive and attentional control over their behavior. Interestingly, sign-tracking is also influenced by reward uncertainty in a way that may promote gambling disorder. Research indicates that reward uncertainty sensitizes sign-tracking responses and favors the development of a sign-tracker phenotype, compatible with the conditioned attractiveness of lights and sounds in casinos for problem gamblers. The study of attentional biases in humans (an effect akin to sign-tracking in animals) leads to similar observations, notably that the propensity to develop attraction for conditioned stimuli (CSs) is predictive of addictive behavior. Here we review the literature on drug addiction and gambling disorder, highlighting the similarities between studies of sign-tracking and attentional biases.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 233 条
[1]   Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction [J].
Ahrens, Allison M. ;
Singer, Bryan F. ;
Fitzpatrick, Christopher J. ;
Morrow, Jonathan D. ;
Robinson, Terry E. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 296 :418-430
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]   Linking dopaminergic reward signals to the development of attentional bias: A positron emission tomographic study [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kuwabara, Hiroto ;
Wong, Dean F. ;
Roberts, Joshua ;
Rahmim, Arman ;
Brasic, James R. ;
Courtney, Susan M. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 157 :27-33
[4]   Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV plus individuals [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kronemer, Sharif I. ;
Rilee, Jessica J. ;
Sacktor, Ned ;
Marvel, Cherie L. .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2016, 92 :157-165
[5]   Mechanisms of Habitual Approach: Failure to Suppress Irrelevant Responses Evoked by Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Folk, Charles L. ;
Garrison, Rebecca ;
Rogers, Leeland .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2016, 145 (06) :796-805
[6]   Attentional Bias for Nondrug Reward Is Magnified in Addiction [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Faulkner, Monica L. ;
Rilee, Jessica J. ;
Yantis, Steven ;
Marvel, Cherie L. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 21 (06) :499-506
[7]   Reward predictions bias attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[8]  
[Anonymous], SIGN TRACKING DRUG A
[9]  
[Anonymous], SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26091-1