Traditional signal pattern recognition versus artificial neural networks for nuclear plant diagnostics

被引:10
|
作者
Keyvan, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Nucl Engn, Rolla, MO 65401 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0149-1970(00)00158-X
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a new tool based on a traditional noise analysis techniques for monitoring reactor components' signal condition. It also presents the performance of artificial neural networks for pattern recognition to the same set of reactor signals and provides a comparison of these two techniques. Reactor pump signals from the Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR-II) are utilized here. Collected signals such as pump power, pump speed, and pump pressure are obtained from already installed sensors in the reactor. The signals utilized are collected signals as well sis generated signals simulating the pump shaft degradation progress. From the study of time series analysis and regression modeling of these signals, a parameter related to degradation and material buildup in the shaft is identified and used in the development of a monitoring tool. The results are then used as a benchmark against which to test the performance of artificial neural networks as a tool for reactor diagnostics. Several neural networks are examined in this study, including Restricted Coulomb Energy (RCE), Cascade Correlation, and Backpropagation paradigms of artificial neural networks. RCE is selected due to its unique design and speed, Backpropagation is selected because it is widely used and well accepted in the neural network research community, and Cascade correlation is selected because it overcomes some of the problems associated with the Backpropagation paradigm. Similar study is performed using the Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) family of neural network paradigms. The results of this study indicate that artificial neural networks are simpler techniques for pattern recognition than noise analysis techniques such as the one introduced here. Neural networks do not require prior fault related parameter identification; they generate their own rules by learning from being shown examples. On the other hand, noise analysis and regression modeling can provide very sensitive techniques for monitoring of a detected problem in a component. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pattern recognition in damaged neural networks
    Miljkovic, V
    Milosevic, S
    Sknepnek, R
    Zivic, I
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2001, 295 (3-4) : 526 - 536
  • [42] Graph of Neural Networks for pattern recognition
    Cardot, H
    Lezoray, O
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 873 - 876
  • [43] Speech recognition with artificial neural networks
    Dede, Guelin
    Sazli, Murat Huesnue
    DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 20 (03) : 763 - 768
  • [44] Immunological Recognition by Artificial Neural Networks
    Jin Xu
    Junghyo Jo
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2018, 73 : 1908 - 1917
  • [45] Immunological Recognition by Artificial Neural Networks
    Xu, Jin
    Jo, Junghyo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 73 (12) : 1908 - 1917
  • [46] Drywell temperature prediction of a nuclear power plant by means of artificial neural networks
    Alvarez-Huerta, Antonio
    Gonzalez-Miguelez, Rodrigo
    Garcia-Metola, David
    Noriega-Gonzalez, Alvaro
    DYNA, 2011, 86 (04): : 467 - 473
  • [47] USE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO ANALYZE NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT PERFORMANCE
    GUO, ZH
    UHRIG, RE
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 99 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [48] Hybrid identification of unlabeled nuclear power plant transients with artificial neural networks
    Embrechts, MJ
    Benedek, S
    IEEE WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 1998, : 1438 - 1443
  • [49] Comparative Analysis of Artificial Hydrocarbon Networks versus Convolutional Neural Networks in Human Activity Recognition
    Ponce, Hiram
    Martinez-Villasenor, Lourdes
    2020 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2020,
  • [50] Biological neural signal collecting and pattern recognition
    School of Electronics and Information, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    不详
    Shu Ju Cai Ji Yu Chu Li, 2007, 1 (38-41): : 38 - 41