Bayesian Estimation and Inference: A User's Guide

被引:324
作者
Zyphur, Michael J. [1 ]
Oswald, Frederick L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Rice Univ, Houston, TX 77251 USA
关键词
Bayes; frequentist; structural equation modeling; null hypothesis significance testing; EGO-DEPLETION; SELF-CONTROL; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH; NULL-HYPOTHESIS; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVES; FREQUENTISTS; ARGUMENTS;
D O I
10.1177/0149206313501200
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper introduces the Bayesian revolution that is sweeping across multiple disciplines but has yet to gain a foothold in organizational research. The foundations of Bayesian estimation and inference are first reviewed. Then, two empirical examples are provided to show how Bayesian methods can overcome limitations of frequentist methods: (a) a structural equation model of testosterone's effect on status in teams, where a Bayesian approach allows directly testing a traditional null hypothesis as a research hypothesis and allows estimating all possible residual covariances in a measurement model, neither of which are possible with frequentist methods; and (b) an ANOVA-style model from a true experiment of ego depletion's effects on performance, where Bayesian estimation with informative priors allows results from all previous research (via a meta-analysis and other previous studies) to be combined with estimates of study effects in a principled manner, yielding support for hypotheses that is not obtained with frequentist methods. Data are available from the first author, code for the program Mplus is provided, and tables illustrate how to present Bayesian results. In conclusion, the many benefits and few hindrances of Bayesian methods are discussed, where the major hindrance has been an easily solvable lack of familiarity by organizational researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 420
页数:31
相关论文
共 121 条
[71]   A logic of induction [J].
Howson, C .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1997, 64 (02) :268-290
[72]  
Howson Colin., 2001, Hume's Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief
[73]  
Jackman S., 2009, BAYESIAN ANAL SOCIAL, VVol. 846
[74]  
Jeffreys H, 1998, The theory of probability
[75]   The selection of prior distributions by formal rules [J].
Kass, RE ;
Wasserman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (435) :1343-1370
[76]   BAYES FACTORS [J].
KASS, RE ;
RAFTERY, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :773-795
[77]  
Kerr N L, 1998, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V2, P196, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
[78]  
Keynes J.M., 2008, A treatise on probability
[79]   The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory [J].
Kluger, AN ;
DeNisi, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :254-284
[80]   The Time Has Come: Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis in the Organizational Sciences [J].
Kruschke, John K. ;
Aguinis, Herman ;
Joo, Harry .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (04) :722-752