Effect of Reduced Audibility on Mini-Mental State Examination Scores

被引:16
作者
Gaeta, Laura [1 ]
Azzarello, Jo [2 ]
Baldwin, Jonathan [3 ]
Ciro, Carrie A. [4 ]
Hudson, Mary A. [5 ]
Johnson, Carole E. [5 ]
John, Andrew B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Nursing, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med Imaging & Radiat Sci, Coll Allied Hlth, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Occupat Therapy Educ, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[5] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Allied Hlth, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
aging; assessment; cognition; hearing loss; HEARING HEALTH-CARE; MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT; BEAVER DAM; MILD; DEMENTIA; ADULTS; AGE; CLASSIFICATION; IMPAIRMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.17139
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: The interaction of audition and cognition has been of interest to researchers and clinicians, especially as the prevalence of hearing loss and cognitive decline increases with advancing age. Cognitive screening tests are commonly used to assess cognitive status in individuals reporting changes in memory or function or to monitor cognitive status over time. These assessments are administered verbally, so performance may be adversely affected by hearing loss. Previous research on the impact of reduced audibility on cognitive screening test scores has been limited to older adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) or young adults with normal hearing and simulated audibility loss. No comparisons have been conducted to determine whether age-related SNHL and its impact on cognitive screening tests is successfully modeled by audibility reduction. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of reduced audibility on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a common bedside cognitive screening instrument, by comparing performance of cognitively normal older adults with SNHL and young adults with normal hearing. Design: A 1:1 gender-matched case control design was used for this study. Study Sample: Thirty older adults (60-80 years old) with mild to moderately severe SNHL (cases) and 30 young adults (18-35 years old) with normal hearing (controls) served as participants for this study. Participants in both groups were selected for inclusion if their cognitive status was within normal limits on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Data Collection and Analysis: Case participants were administered a recorded version of the MMSE in background noise at a signal-to-noise ratio of +25-dB SNR. Control participants were administered a digitally filtered version of the MMSE that reflected the loss of audibility (i.e., threshold elevation) of the matched case participant at a signal-to-noise ratio of +25-dB SNR. Performance on the MMSE was scored using standard criteria. Results: Between-group analyses revealed no significant difference in the MMSE score. However, within-group analyses showed that education was a significant effect modifier for the case participants. Conclusions: Reduced audibility has a negative effect on MMSE score in cognitively intact participants, which contributes to and confirms the findings of earlier studies. The findings suggest that observed reductions in score on the MMSE were primarily due to loss of audibility of the test item. The negative effects of audibility loss may be greater in individuals who have lower levels of educational attainment. Higher levels of educational attainment may offset decreased performance on the MMSE because of reduced audibility. Failure to consider audibility and optimize communication when administering these assessments can lead to invalid results (e.g., false positives or missed information), misdiagnosis, and inappropriate recommendations for medication or intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 855
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 2007, S351997R2007 ANSI AC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Quick Speech-in-Noise Test
[3]  
Auditec of St. Louis, 1971, MULT BABBL
[4]   Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review [J].
Barnett, Margaret ;
Hixon, Brian ;
Okwiri, Neville ;
Irungu, Catherine ;
Ayugi, John ;
Thompson, Robin ;
Shinn, Jennifer B. ;
Bush, Matthew L. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (05) :1187-1194
[5]   Effects of Aging and Adult-Onset Hearing Loss on Cortical Auditory Regions [J].
Cardin, Velia .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
[6]   Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise [J].
Carroll, Rebecca ;
Warzybok, Anna ;
Kollmeier, Birger ;
Ruigendijk, Esther .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
[7]  
Cattel C, 2000, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V55, pM98
[8]   Rurality and Determinants of Hearing Healthcare in Adult Hearing Aid Recipients [J].
Chan, Stephen ;
Hixon, Brian ;
Adkins, Margaret ;
Shinn, Jennifer B. ;
Bush, Matthew L. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (10) :2362-2367
[9]   Use of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Stroke [J].
Chiti, Guido ;
Pantoni, Leonardo .
STROKE, 2014, 45 (10) :3135-+
[10]   Studies of Physician-Patient Communication with Older Patients: How Often is Hearing Loss Considered? A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Cohen, Jamie M. ;
Blustein, Jan ;
Weinstein, Barbara E. ;
Dischinger, Hannah ;
Sherman, Scott ;
Grudzen, Corita ;
Chodosh, Joshua .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2017, 65 (08) :1642-1649