Alzheimer's disease in the UK: comparative evidence on cost of illness and volume of health services research funding

被引:56
作者
Lowin, A [1 ]
Knapp, M [1 ]
McCrone, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Hlth Serv Res Dept, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London SE5 8AF, England
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; cost of illness; economics; research funding;
D O I
10.1002/gps.499
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective To review the economic cost of Alzheimer's disease. to determine the level of research expenditure directed at this illness and to make comparisons with cancer, stroke and heart disease. Method A literature search of cost-of-illness studies was conducted and major funders of research were contacted. Cost-of-illness estimates were updated and adjusted to enable comparability across the four disease areas. Results The direct costs of Alzheimer's disease were estimated to be between pound7.06 billion and pound14.93 billion, which was substantially greater than stroke (pound3.2 billion), heart disease (pound4.05 billion) and cancer (pound1.6 billion excluding informal care costs). Research expenditure on Alzheimer's disease was 57% of that on stroke, 10% of that on heart disease and 3% of that on cancer. Discussion Alzheimer's disease imposes a high economic burden. However, spending on research is disproportionately low compared with spending on other major illnesses. In the light of these two findings we recommend further discussion of the distribution of public funding for research into this disease. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ALZHEIMERS DIS UK BU
[2]  
BOSANQUET N, 1998, STROKE CARE REDUCING
[3]  
Cavallo MC, 1997, ALZ DIS ASSOC DIS, V11, P184
[4]  
Chamberlain J, 1997, BRIT J UROL, V79, P1
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, HEP HLTH NHS RES ORG
[6]  
Fireman BH, 1997, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V18, P51
[7]  
Gray A, 1993, Health Trends, V25, P31
[8]   The friction cost method: A comment [J].
Johannesson, M ;
Karlsson, G .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (02) :249-255
[9]  
Knapp M, 1998, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V13, P531, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199808)13:8<531::AID-GPS815>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-M