Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Simple Summary Primary tumor resection with lymphadenectomy in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms potentially requires extensive small bowel resections due to central lymph node metastases and mesenteric fibrosis. Retrograde vessel-sparing lymphadenectomy (VS-LA) might be a sufficient method for avoiding local recurrence and for sparing the small bowel at the same time. We retrospectively analyzed clinical, surgical and pathological data of 50 patients with SI-NENs who exclusively underwent small bowel resections; half of them received conventional lymphadenectomy and 25 underwent VS-LA. VS-LA resulted in shorter resected bowel segments (median 40 cm vs. 65 cm, p = 0.007) with similar rates of local R0 resections (72% vs. 84%) and number of resected lymph nodes (median 13 vs. 13). Postoperative complications occurred significantly less in the vessel-sparing group. VS-LA should be the preferred surgical method in small bowel resections for SI-NENs. Introduction: The goal of primary tumor resection with lymphadenectomy (PTR) in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NENs) is to avoid local recurrence while sparing as much of the small bowel as possible, even in the case of extensive mesenteric fibrosis. The results of PTR with retrograde vessel-sparing lymphadenectomy (VS-LA) were compared to those of conventional lymphadenectomy (Con-LA). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical, surgical and pathological data of consecutive patients with SI-NENs who underwent small bowel resections were retrospectively analyzed regarding the resection technique performed. Results: In a 7-year period, 50 of 102 patients with SI-NENs had only small bowel resections; of those, 25 were VS-LA and 25 were Con-LA. Patients with VS-LA had tendentially more advanced diseases with slightly higher rates of abdominal pain, mesenteric shrinkage and more level III lymph node involvement compared to patients with Con-LA. VS-LA, however, resulted in shorter resected bowel segments (median 40 cm vs. 65 cm, p = 0.007) with similar rates of local R0 resections (72% vs. 84%) and resected lymph nodes (median 13 vs. 13). Postoperative clinically relevant complications occurred in 1 of 25 (4%) in the VS-LA and in 7 of 25 (28%) patients in the Con-LA group (p = 0.02). Three months after surgery, 1 of 25 (4%) patients of the VS-LA group and 10 of 25 (40%) patients in the Con-LA group (p = 0.002) complained about abdominal pain. One of eight patients in the VS-LA group and two of thirteen patients in the Con-LA group who had completely resected stage III disease complained about diarrhea (p = 0.31). Conclusion: VS-LA seems to be oncologically safe and should be considered in small bowel resections for SI-NENs.