Experimental investigation of mechanical response and fracture failure behavior of wire rope with different given surface wear

被引:47
作者
Chang, Xiang-Dong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peng, Yu-Xing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Zhen-Cai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gong, Xian-Sheng [4 ]
Yu, Zhang-Fa [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mi, Zhen-Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Chun-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Jiangsu Key Lab Mine Mech & Elect Equipment, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Intelligent Min Eq, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Univ, Coll Mech Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[5] Cit Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Luoyang, Peoples R China
[6] Luoyang Min Machinery Engn Design Inst Co Ltd, Luoyang, Peoples R China
[7] CITIC HIC, State Key Lab Min Heavy Equipment, Luoyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Wire rope; Wear scar; Breaking tensile test; Failure mechanism; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; CAST-IRON ROLLERS; FRETTING WEAR; STEEL WIRE; HOISTING ROPE; FRICTION; FATIGUE; STRANDS; MINE; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.004
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Wear is one of the primary factors for the degradation of the wire rope used for multi-layer winding hoist. It decreases the carrying capacity and service life of the hoisting rope, which will affect the mine safety directly. In this paper, the effects of the wear scars caused by sliding friction under different crossing angles and cross directions on the mechanical response of the wire rope were investigated through the breaking tensile test. Additionally, the fracture failure mechanism of the rope samples was discussed. Results show that the surface wear decreases the breaking force of the wire rope. The distribution of wear region and the maximum wear depth of the wear scar are the major influence factors on the mechanical properties of the rope. The variation range of the breaking force is larger for the rope with the wear scar under the sliding condition of right cross contact and the damage is more serious for that in the condition of left cross contact. There is obvious plastic deformation and temperature rise near the wear scar before the rope breaks. The fracture failure mechanism is ductile fracture with necking and dimples on the surface.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 221
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Dry sliding of a low steel friction material against cast iron at different loads: Characterization of the friction layer and wear debris
    Alemani, M.
    Gialanella, S.
    Straffelini, G.
    Ciudin, R.
    Olofsson, U.
    Perricone, G.
    Metinoz, I.
    [J]. WEAR, 2017, 376 : 1450 - 1459
  • [2] AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF WIRE STRAINS IN AN UNDAMAGED AND DAMAGED STEEL STRAND SUBJECTED TO TENSILE LOAD
    CAPPA, P
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1988, 28 (04) : 346 - 349
  • [3] Effects of Strand Lay Direction and Crossing Angle on Tribological Behavior of Winding Hoist Rope
    Chang, Xiang-dong
    Peng, Yu-xing
    Zhu, Zhen-cai
    Gong, Xian-sheng
    Yu, Zhang-fa
    Mi, Zhen-tao
    Xu, Chun-ming
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2017, 10 (06)
  • [4] Tribological properties of winding hoisting rope between two layers with different sliding parameters
    Chang, Xiang-dong
    Peng, Yu-xing
    Zhu, Zhen-cai
    Wang, Da-gang
    Gong, Xian-sheng
    Zou, Sheng-yong
    Sun, Shi-sheng
    Xu, Wen-xue
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 8 (12): : 1 - 14
  • [5] Chaplin C R., 2005, Hoist and Haul Conference Perth, WA, P5
  • [6] FAILURE MECHANISMS IN WIRE ROPES
    CHAPLIN, CR
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 1995, 2 (01) : 45 - 57
  • [7] Chaplin CR, 2008, S MECH SLEND STRUCT
  • [8] Costello G.A., 1997, Theory of Wire Rope
  • [9] Fretting wear of thin steel wires. Part 2: Influence of crossing angle
    Cruzado, A.
    Hartelt, M.
    Waesche, R.
    Urchegui, M. A.
    Gomez, X.
    [J]. WEAR, 2011, 273 (01) : 60 - 69
  • [10] Fretting wear of thin steel wires. Part 1: Influence of contact pressure
    Cruzado, A.
    Hartelt, M.
    Waesche, R.
    Urchegui, M. A.
    Gomez, X.
    [J]. WEAR, 2010, 268 (11-12) : 1409 - 1416