'Platformisation' of work: An EU perspective on Introducing a legal presumption

被引:16
作者
Kullmann, Miriam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Labour Law, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Harvard Univ, Weatherhead Ctr Int Affairs, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] European Comm Social Rights, Strasbourg, France
关键词
Platform workers; classification; rebuttable legal presumption; EU social partner consultation; LAW; REMEDIES; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1177/20319525211063112
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
For some time now, the European Commission has stressed the need to address the ongoing misclassification of employment status in platform work and has thus considered introducing a rebuttable presumption of employment status or a reversal of the burden of proof. This contribution focuses on the benefits and limitations of introducing a rebuttable legal presumption in EU labour law as an evidentiary means to improve the working conditions of platform workers. In doing so, some general remarks on rebuttable legal presumptions will be made, while also offering some comparative legal insights, before exploring their potential benefits and limitations in the context of EU labour law in general and platform work in particular. This contribution will finish with an analysis of how such a presumption could be integrated in the current EU social acquis.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 80
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Accetto M, 2005, EUR PUBLIC LAW, V11, P375
[2]  
Adams-Prassl Jeremias, PLATFORMISATION WORK
[3]  
Aloisi Antonio, PLATFORMISATION WORK
[4]  
Countouris Nicola., 2019, New Trade Union Strategies for New Forms of Employment
[5]  
Davidov Guy, 2017, SPANISH LABOUR LAW E, V6, P6, DOI DOI 10.20318/SLLERJ.2017.3921
[6]  
Davidov Guy, 2017, SPANISH LABOUR LAW E, V6, P9
[7]  
De Stefano V, 2016, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, V37, P471
[8]  
De Stefano Valerio, 2020, UK LABOUR LAW
[9]  
De Stefano Valerio, 2016, COMP LABOR LAW POLIC, V37, P500
[10]  
Eilmansberger T, 2004, COMMON MKT LAW REV, V41, P1199