Validation of the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines on management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: more than 5 years of follow-up

被引:18
作者
Imbe, Koh [1 ]
Nagata, Naoyoshi [1 ]
Hisada, Yuya [1 ]
Takasaki, Yusuke [1 ]
Sekine, Katsunori [1 ]
Mishima, Saori [1 ,2 ]
Kawazoe, Akihito [1 ,2 ]
Tajima, Tsuyoshi [3 ]
Shimbo, Takuro [4 ]
Yanase, Mikio [1 ]
Akiyama, Junichi [1 ]
Fujimoto, Kazuma [5 ]
Uemura, Naomi [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Shinjuku Ku, 1-21-1 Toyama, Tokyo 1628655, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr East Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Shinjuku Ku, 1-21-1 Toyama, Tokyo 1628655, Japan
[4] Ohta Nishinouchi Hosp, 2-5-20 Nishinouchi, Koriyama, Fukushima 9638558, Japan
[5] Saga Univ, Dept Internal Med & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Fac Med, 1 Honjo Machi, Saga 8408502, Japan
[6] Kohnodai Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, 1-7-1 Kohnodai, Chiba 2728516, Japan
关键词
Pancreatic cyst; Pancreatic neoplasms; Pancreatic ductal carcinoma; Cohort studies; Validation studies; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; PANCREATIC CYSTS; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; HEALTH-CARE; DIAGNOSIS; RESECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-4966-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Recent guidelines suggest that imaging surveillance be conducted for 5 years for patients with at most one high-risk feature. If there were no significant changes, surveillance is stopped. We sought to validate this follow-up strategy. In study 1, data were analysed for 392 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and at most one high-risk feature who were periodically followed up for more than 1 year with imaging tests. In study 2, data were analysed for 159 IPMN patients without worsening high-risk features after 5 years (stop surveillance group). In study 1, pancreatic cancer (PC) was identified in 12 patients (27.3%) in the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) indication group and none in the non-EUS-FNA indication group (P < 0.01). In the EUS-FNA indication group, 11 patients (25%) died, whereas 29 (8.3%) died in the non EUS-FNA indication group (P < 0.01). In study 2 (stop surveillance group), PC was identified in three patients (1.9%) at 84, 103 and 145 months. PC risk and mortality for IPMNs not showing significant change for 5 years is likely to be low, and the non-EUS-FNA indication can provide reasonable decisions. However, three patients without worsening high-risk features for 5 years developed PC. The stop surveillance strategy should be reconsidered. aEuro cent The AGA guidelines provide reasonable clinical decisions for the EUS-FNA indication. aEuro cent In stop surveillance group, PC was identified in 3 patients (1.9%). aEuro cent In stop surveillance group, 2 of 3 PC patients died from PC. aEuro cent Risk of pancreatic cancer in "stop surveillance" group is not negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 178
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bottger TC, 1999, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V46, P2589
[2]   Italian consensus guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms [J].
Buscarini, Elisabetta ;
Pezzilli, Raffaele ;
Cannizzaro, Renato ;
De Angelis, Claudio ;
Gion, Massimo ;
Morana, Giovanni ;
Zamboni, Giuseppe ;
Arcidiacono, Paolo ;
Balzano, Gianpaolo ;
Barresi, Luca ;
Basso, Daniela ;
Bocus, Paolo ;
Calculli, Lucia ;
Capurso, Gabriele ;
Canzonieri, Vincenzo ;
Casadei, Riccardo ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
D'Onofrio, Mirko ;
Frulloni, Luca ;
Fusaroli, Pietro ;
Manfredi, Guido ;
Pacchioni, Donatella ;
Pasquali, Claudio ;
Rocca, Rodolfo ;
Ventrucci, Maurizio ;
Venturini, Silvia ;
Villanacci, Vincenzo ;
Zerbi, Alessandro ;
Falconi, Massimo .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2014, 46 (06) :479-493
[3]   Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods [J].
Cahalane, Alexis M. ;
Purcell, Y. M. ;
Lavelle, L. P. ;
McEvoy, S. H. ;
Ryan, E. R. ;
O'Toole, E. ;
Malone, D. E. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (09) :3121-3128
[4]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[5]  
Gouillat C, 2001, GUT, V49, pIV32
[6]   Validation of international consensus guidelines for the resection of branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [J].
Jang, J. -Y. ;
Park, T. ;
Lee, S. ;
Kang, M. J. ;
Lee, S. Y. ;
Lee, K. B. ;
Chang, Y. R. ;
Kim, S. -W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (06) :686-692
[7]   Natural History of Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas A Multicenter Study in Japan [J].
Maguchi, Hiroyuki ;
Tanno, Satoshi ;
Mizuno, Nobumasa ;
Hanada, Keiji ;
Kobayashi, Go ;
Hatori, Takashi ;
Sadakari, Yoshihiko ;
Yamaguchi, Taketo ;
Tobita, Kosuke ;
Doi, Ryuichiro ;
Yanagisawa, Akio ;
Tanaka, Masao .
PANCREAS, 2011, 40 (03) :364-370
[8]   Observational Study of the Incidence of Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Malignancies During Surveillance of Patients With Branch-duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm [J].
Malleo, Giuseppe ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Borin, Alex ;
Capelli, Paola ;
Accordini, Federico ;
Butturini, Giovanni ;
Pederzoli, Paolo ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Salvia, Roberto .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (05) :984-990
[9]   A Comparative Analysis of Survival Outcomes Between Pancreatectomy and Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [J].
Marmor, Schelomo ;
Burke, Erin E. ;
Virnig, Beth A. ;
Jensen, Eric H. ;
Tuttle, Todd M. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (21) :3378-3385
[10]   What Changes In Survival Rates Tell Us About US Health Care [J].
Muennig, Peter A. ;
Glied, Sherry A. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (11) :2105-2113