Relational expectancy fulfillment as an explanatory variable for distinguishing couple types

被引:10
作者
Kelley, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ W, Dept Commun Studies 3251, Phoenix, AZ 85069 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00452.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Previous research demonstrates that Traditional and Separate-Traditional (Mixed) couples report highest levels of marital satisfaction, followed by Independents and Separates (Fitzpatrick, 1988). This research project used an expectancy fulfillment to understand these differences in marital satisfaction across couple type. Focusing on relational expectations (Kelley Ci Burgeon, 1991) as critical variables to relational functioning, behavior-expectation discrepancy scores across 7 relational dimensions (intimacy, dominance, quality-h-usf, receptivity, distance, noncomposure-arousal, and informality) were examined by couple type. As predicted, Traditional couples generally reported more expectancy fulfillment and relational satisfaction than did other couple types, and Separates less. Only informality failed to distinguish between any 2 couple types. Interestingly, Traditionals experienced primarily positive expectancy violations, whereas Separates experienced more negative violations than did other couple types. Couples also differed as to what they considered a positive or negative violation. Both couple type and relational discrepancy scores were found to be important predictors of relational satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 442
页数:23
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, HDB STAT PROCEDURES
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION YB
[3]   DIMENSIONS OF THERAPIST RESPONSE AS CAUSAL FACTORS IN THERAPEUTIC CHANGE [J].
BARRETTLENNARD, GT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1962, 76 (43) :1-36
[4]   INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTIONS AND MARITAL ADJUSTMENT [J].
BOCHNER, AP ;
KRUEGER, DL ;
CHMIELEWSKI, TL .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1982, 32 (03) :135-147
[5]  
Burgoon J.K., 1978, HUM COMMUN RES, V4, P129, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1978.TB00603.X, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978]
[6]   NONVERBAL EXPECTANCY VIOLATIONS - MODEL ELABORATION AND APPLICATION TO IMMEDIACY BEHAVIORS [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
HALE, JL .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1988, 55 (01) :58-79
[7]   VALIDATION AND MEASUREMENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEMES OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
HALE, JL .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1987, 54 (01) :19-41
[8]   THE FUNDAMENTAL TOPOI OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
HALE, JL .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1984, 51 (03) :193-214
[9]   A DISCREPANCY-AROUSAL EXPLANATION OF MUTUAL INFLUENCE IN EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR FOR ADULT AND INFANT-ADULT INTERACTION [J].
CAPPELLA, JN ;
GREENE, JO .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1982, 49 (02) :89-114
[10]  
Crocker L., 2008, INTRO CLASSICAL MODE