Systemic risk spillovers between crude oil and stock index returns of G7 economies: Conditional value-at-risk and marginal expected shortfall approaches

被引:63
作者
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar [1 ,5 ]
Trabelsi, Nader [2 ,3 ]
Alqahtani, Faisal [4 ]
Raheem, Ibrahim D.
机构
[1] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Finance & Banking, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ IMSIU, Coll Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Finance & Investment, POB 5701, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Kairouan, Tunisia LARTIGE, Kairouan, Tunisia
[4] Minist Finance, Marco & Fiscal Policies Deputyship, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] South Ural State Univ, Lenin Prospect 76, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
关键词
CoVaR; MES; Systemic risk; Oil prices; Stock markets; G7; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; PRICE SHOCKS; MARKET VOLATILITY; TIME-SERIES; COMMODITY; SECTOR; DEPENDENCE; MOVEMENTS; QUANTILE; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104646
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we examine systemic risk and dependence between oil and stock market indices of G7 economies between January 2003 and November 2017. Coincidentally, this timeframe covers different distress periods in financial and energy markets. We use several time-constant, time-varying and time-varying Markov-copula models to examine the dependence. Further, we use the delta conditional value-at-risk (Delta CoVaR) of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) and marginal expected shortfall (MES) of Acharya et al. (2012) to captures the risk spillover effects and give evidence of systemic risk. From the copula analysis, we find dissimilar dependence structure between returns series of oil and the G7 stock markets. For France, Germany and Japan, the dependence is Markov-switching time-varying, while it is time-varying for the United States and Canada, constant for the United Kingdom and around zero for Italy. Our empirical evidence on systemic risk indicates that oil price dynamics contributes significantly more to the G7 stock market returns during volatile times than during tranquil times. In particular, the Canada stock market appears more sensitive and vulnerable to negative external shocks emerging from the crude oil market than the other markets. Further, the country risk rankings identified using MES and Delta CoVaR may not be identical. In addition, the analysis results suggest that the crude oil market can be a good diversifier for investors in Japan and France and that the investors in the rest of G7 countries must act more carefully. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Dependence structure and extreme comovements in international equity and bond markets [J].
Garcia, Rene ;
Tsafack, Georges .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (08) :1954-1970
[32]   WILL OIL MARKETS TIGHTEN AGAIN - A SURVEY OF POLICIES TO MANAGE POSSIBLE OIL-SUPPLY DISRUPTIONS [J].
GILBERT, RJ ;
MORK, KA .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1984, 6 (01) :111-142
[33]   Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR [J].
Girardi, Giulio ;
Erguen, A. Tolga .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (08) :3169-3180
[34]   BIVARIATE EXPONENTIAL-DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
GUMBEL, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1960, 55 (292) :698-707
[35]   Relationship between the oil price volatility and sectoral stock markets in oil-exporting economies: Evidence from wavelet nonlinear denoised based quantile and Granger-causality analysis [J].
Hamdi, Besma ;
Aloui, Mouna ;
Alqahtani, Faisal ;
Tiwari, Aviral .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 :536-552
[36]   OIL AND THE MACROECONOMY SINCE WORLD-WAR-II [J].
HAMILTON, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1983, 91 (02) :228-248
[37]   Dynamic relationships among GCC stock markets and NYMEX oil futures [J].
Hammoudeh, S ;
Aleisa, E .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2004, 22 (02) :250-269
[38]  
Huang RD, 1996, J FUTURES MARKETS, V16, P1
[39]  
Joe H., 1997, MULTIVARIATE MODELS
[40]   The impact of oil price shocks on the stock market return and volatility relationship [J].
Kang, Wensheng ;
Ratti, Ronald A. ;
Yoon, Kyung Hwan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2015, 34 :41-54